Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Stock Swap -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Galirayo who wrote (11820)	2/11/1998 1:25:00 AM
From: Andrew Vance	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17305

AV -- How fitting, a year after starting this thread, we made the Hot Subjects list. Since HOT and GOING STRONG after a year. Happy Anniversary to us!!!!! Andrew Today might have been a 150+ post day. I am glad few if any of mine were wasted posts just to run up the numbers<GGGG>. BTW Boys, you might to check out post #11,800 again.

To: Galirayo who wrote (11820)	2/11/1998 9:48:00 AM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 17305

REGN The scary thing about that stock is that it is so news-driven. Dillon-Read gets behind that stock a lot. Or at least they used to. About 4 or 5 years ago the stock ranged from 13 to 20. Then there was a botched FDA trial which dropped the stock from ~20 to ~13. Then more bad news on a subsequent trial and eventually down to less than 5. Then the former Merck chairman stepped in as REGN chairman and immediately it was at 7, eventually going to the ~13 to ~20 range and while at ~20 then a botched FDA ruling and thwack....back to 13. Now in the $7 range again. How often can history repeat here? Watching this thing makes me feel as if I have a picture in the attic in which the subject is getting older.