Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (249892)	9/1/2022 12:17:50 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 360802

It was in a court filing. How can that be considered a leak? If it was filed as confidential, and I am not sure that is even possible in a case like this, then you'd have a point. But it wasn't and you don't. The fact that you seem to believe the Mueller investigation was false, just shows the depths of you delusion. Or maybe desperation.

To: i-node who wrote (249892)	9/1/2022 2:43:40 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 360802

I see now. Calling it a leak something was part of a filing was a lie. I say lie because leak is defamatory. You have some basis for calling a leak an ethical issue. A filing, particularly one in response to a filing from your guy, not so much. You're defaming people for doing their jobs according to regular order. You know, Trump brought this on himself. There's nothing out there that would have been out there without his squawking and protest filing with the court. Remember, he's the one who announced to the public the search order that started this. The FBI would have been operating in private as is their standard practice. Trump is the center of attention again, which he craves. He really raised a ruckus this time.