Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus who wrote (191693)	9/13/2022 5:54:31 AM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By marcher Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219648

Re <<seems to me you always cop to "agnostic" while so obviously voicing your bias, as a way of hedging against being wrong about what you ACTUALLY believe.>> ... just seems that way. Am big practitioner of '*do not argue, for if I am right I do not have and if I am wrong, do not have to, and if unsure, just say so*' any bias is just a dot on the spectrum of possibilities. For example, I am ~15% in physical gold, but am agnostic as to whether-and-when global monetary reset might happen. But, am more sure that reset will happen, not at all sure about when, except suspect 2026 - 2032, and more close to 2032, which all boils down to 15% allocation as opposed to 100%. Cannot be more clear than above, because the topic is a puzzle.