Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ggersh who wrote (192044)	9/21/2022 8:42:48 PM
From: TobagoJack	3 Recommendations Recommended By fred woodall ggersh maceng2 Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217654

In response to the Coconut I had just sent her my entire curation of related YouTube channels, and they are hereunder. Have other collections (macro, finance, travel, TV / Movies, etc)

To: ggersh who wrote (192044)	9/22/2022 3:07:03 AM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 217654

I agree with someone else (forgot who) who reckoned that now nation after nation must do 'limited' mobilisation simply because each has no idea what others might try to do, and that mobilisation requires lead-time, earlier done the better, especially as the world is short on weapons stockpile and long on grievances. Mobilisation, limited or otherwise, especially economic / industrial mobilisation, requires a lot of printed, borrowed, and taxed fiat, and might well require officialdom to hoard gold, weaponised gold, events might go 'much more than mere interesting' quite soon I still see no reason to move the 2026 / 2032 time-markers, but do note that the markers are looking quite realistic