Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (1376286)	10/6/2022 3:03:00 PM
From: golfer72	Respond to of 1570958

PM sent

To: i-node who wrote (1376286)	10/6/2022 3:13:26 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570958

CIDRAP is still one of the best sources for mask research cidrap.umn.edu

To: i-node who wrote (1376286)	10/6/2022 3:13:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 pocotrader Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570958

I don't get it, i-node. You linked to a study published by the CDC in support of mask mandates. But then you call it "without any doubt the worst article I've ever seen in my life" without providing any material countering that study. Until I see evidence to the contrary, I'm going to accept that CDC study as a valid one in support of masks. That's not the only study, mind you. A simple Google search produces MANY results, including this one that explores the difference between masks blocking transmission in the exhale direction, and masks blocking transmission in the inhale direction: How effective is a mask in preventing COVID-19 infection? - PMC (nih.gov) The bottom line is that the cure to bad science is BETTER science, not MORE bad science. Tenchusatsu