SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stock Puppy who wrote (769102)10/6/2022 10:30:19 PM
From: skinowski1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Stock Puppy

  Respond to of 793648
 
It seems to me that a false flag in case of a nuclear attack would not change much. Propaganda doesn’t work against retaliation. Whichever way such an exchange would begin, it would go both ways - until either one side would stop the escalation and suggest negotiations - or it goes to a full global blowup. Once it gets rolling, it’s likely to happen fast. It would make no difference that it started over the issue of “encouraging” Ukraine to try to join nato - about which most of the world wouldn’t care at all.

Sometimes, I think about those days prior to the war when Biden kept saying every day when exactly an invasion was going to begin. No one ever asked him if he tried calling Putin to discuss how war could be prevented. I doubt that he - or anyone - did.



To: Stock Puppy who wrote (769102)10/7/2022 7:52:45 PM
From: Jacob Snyder3 Recommendations

Recommended By
alanrs
Hoa Hao
pak73

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793648
 
< false flag nuclear strike>

Can’t be done.

The uranium or plutonium in every nuke, has impurities (other isotopes), which are a chemical fingerprint. Fallout gets widely dispersed. Just get a sample, analyse it, and you know exactly where the bomb came from. Impossible to fake; impossible to hide.