Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (192544)	10/8/2022 12:44:53 PM
From: Rarebird	Respond to of 218800

Clearly, It bothers you that most of Asia is very dependent on the USA, in particular the way the USD trades. You are full of contradictions and inconsistencies. You want the USA to be more pro worker and pro union, yet they should support more Free Trade. The unions and most blue collar workers are not pro free trade. What they are is pro higher salaries for themselves at home. The two, pro free trade and cow towing to unions and workers are not compatible. It is a delicate situation, which is difficult to satisfy all parties concerned. I am more in the free trade camp.

To: maceng2 who wrote (192544)	10/8/2022 12:53:54 PM
From: Rarebird	1 Recommendation Recommended By Pogeu Mahone Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218800

No sure where you are located, but many workers and unions got screwed as a result of US free trade deals, such as NAFTA, where production was moved outside the USA, where costs were cheaper, such as salaries. Most US workers support made in USA. Richer folk tend not to care so much and just want the best price. Balancing the Global demand and benefits of Free Trade with the demands of many workers is not always easy. Both sides get screwed in a way.