Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (769406)	10/12/2022 9:42:17 AM
From: rxbond	2 Recommendations Recommended By isopatch Sdgla Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

Durham charging anyone for lying to the FBI about anything to do with the dossier or Russian hoax is the biggest bunch of bullshit ever heaped onto the people of the United States. What a total scam. Lying to the lying FBI about a lie. It's not a lie if the FBI asks you to lie to them.

To: Sdgla who wrote (769406)	10/12/2022 4:53:23 PM
From: didjuneau	Respond to of 793670

Two words: Speaking indictment I'm starting to seriously consider the idea that Durham has been blocked by Garland from pursuing other cases. The fact that he is personally involved in this case, and new facts are being exposed, suggests he might be using this case as a hedge against his Report being redacted. I think you may have been the first here to find an article about that theory. I couldn't find your post again, but it was in a thread that included LindyBill. Found this from you: Message 33896490 Maybe the appointment was a sham - the actual goal being falsely represented. Durham seems to be thorough and disciplined, but in a controlled box. The legal briefs give him an opportunity to let some light shine into his findings. Otherwise, it's like a chicken tractor - moving the box from Durham to the courts - we never get to see what's going on. The NYT foia'd Durham's examination of the CIA years ago. They didn't get anything back. We'll see if Trump's lawyers can use Durham to leverage information: lawandcrime.com Trump’s Attorneys Cite John Durham’s Indictment of Igor Danchenko to Fight Sanctions Request in Hillary Clinton RICO Lawsuit