Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1376853)	10/13/2022 12:54:42 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584057

Wharfie, Why? Jones was making up to $800,000 profit a day off their misery, and it went on for many days. Were those profits directly taken out of the pockets of those victims? Could those victims collectively have made $800K a day had it not been for Alex Jones and his followers? If you want to make it illegal to profit off of "fake news" and "hate speech," then you should start by repealing the First Amendment, or getting the Supreme Court to decide that "fake news" and "hate speech" isn't free speech. But that should have no bearing on how much victims of libel and slander should be awarded. Either that, or I really hope a deep-pocketed media organization slanders me. Then I can sue them for millions, just like Nick Sandmann did and Kyle Rittenhouse is likely to be considering. Tenchusatsu