Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (2594)	2/11/1998 3:37:00 PM
From: M. M. Jones	Respond to of 4736

Bob-- IMHO it is most likely true there are no meaningful test results on either the UPR drilling or the KNE fields. Basis for my comment: I was communicating with cAPS in real time over AOL's Instant Messenger when we decided to call Gruy. I got a minute by minute real time account of what was transpiring. I asked questions too. I was very surprised and disappointed by what we heard -- as was cAPS. M.M.

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (2594)	2/11/1998 3:47:00 PM
From: bob	Respond to of 4736

Guess your right, Bob. Mark Shoemocker from UPR was in on this with the rest of us cockroaches. Wonder why Marty can be the NAE mouthpiece on the net but when the news sucks it can't be discussed on the net. Bob, can you do a little DD on that for me? Thanks in advance, Bob

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (2594)	2/11/1998 4:39:00 PM
From: Hunter Vann	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

Sturgeon..I seriously doubt anyone believes you actually talked to ANYONE associated with Gruy & Associates. You've lied before and I have no doubt that you are continuing to do so. The people on this thread have seen your true colors. You've done ZERO due diligence up to this point and now you expect us to believe that you spoke with someone from Gruy & Associates? Get real! *Let's look at the scenario very closely. We have a gentleman, cAPSLOCK who has quite a few shares of NAMX. He's been an avid reader & poster to this thread for quite some time. I think it's also safe to say that Mr. cAPSLOCK has looked at both the postive and negative side of the issues involving NAMX. To say the least, he's been quite fair in his evaluation of both pros & cons. I admire him for posting both negative and postive information about NAMX.* Bob Sturgeon on the other hand plays a different ballgame. He's been on a constant hype campaign since this saga started. He's NEVER said one bad word about anything that has gone on within the company. He's always been critical of others that have put any type of negative spin on the dealings of NAMX management. He's defensive & critical of anybody that says anything negative about the company or its' management. Suspicious to say the least.