Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (7274)	2/11/1998 5:27:00 PM
From: Citibob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10368

To all: What is so mind boggling with this BNGO right now is assuming they have $1.40 in cash per share. At the closing market price of $3.625 we have a business that the market says is only worth nearly $2.25 a share. $3.625 market price -$1.400 cash _______ $2.225 the rest of the business valued at $ per share These numbers are unbelieveable even for someone who has no gambling spirit. Why has not someone come forward and offered them say $8 to $10 no questions asked to steal it away. Go figure? SC politics or not it has to be worth at least that much. Comments? Citibob

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (7274)	2/12/1998 7:47:00 AM
From: T.K. Allen	Respond to of 10368

Valuespec - A few weeks ago I started a website for BNGO data. In fact, I had been working on it for about a week when you posted the notice about your website. Although incomplete, you will find many links there which you are free to use or, if you prefer, provide a link on your site to mine. Here is the URL: geocities.com I am convinced BNGO's share price isn't going up until this SC political albatross is lifted from around its neck - one way or the other. As Scott, Citibob and others have pointed out, this company is worth more than this even without SC VGMs. Furthermore, I have been drawn off into other urgent business recently and this is likely to continue for a few weeks. Therefore, I will be an infrequent poster to SI for the near future, although I do expect to monitor the thread (back to the realm of the lurkers!). I also will not be able to update my website for awhile. When the SC situation resolves itself, I hope to return to a more active role. I have one suggestion I will leave with y'all. I think someone should spearhead an email campaign aimed particularly at the South Carolina PRO-VGM Senators and those legislators who are considered to be "on the fence". If this issue is going to come down to a filibuster, that is going to be a VERY steep mountain for Gov. Beasley and the anti-VGM forces to climb. However, it is crucial that those legislators in our camp REMAIN THERE and that as many fence-sitters as possible lean to our side. There are links at my website to the South Carolina General Assembly website where someone should be able compile a list of email addresses for the legislators. What remains to be done is for someone to find out which legislators are in our camp and which are fence-sitting. Maybe Freeus can mobilize her Libertarian colleagues around the country to join this campaign. Ed Pettee, you are fairly well connected politically. I think you are a good candidate to spearhead this. What do you think? Hope to talk with y'all soon. TKA