Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: didjuneau who wrote (770598)	10/31/2022 11:54:28 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793838

The cops latest story is nobody was in their underwear.

To: didjuneau who wrote (770598)	10/31/2022 12:12:34 PM
From: Alan Smithee	1 Recommendation Recommended By Winfastorlose Respond to of 793838

David DePape’s ex apologizes to Pelosis: He was ‘very much in alignment’ with my ‘very progressive views’ At least they are failing in attempts to paint him as a Q-anon follower pro-Maga Republican.

To: didjuneau who wrote (770598)	10/31/2022 12:14:03 PM
From: skinowski	6 Recommendations Recommended By Alan Smithee Ben Smith didjuneau garrettjax kckip and 1 more member Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793838

2. (a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas. noun 1. a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas The most outlandish act of linguistic piracy occurred when they started calling Big Gov redistributionists, social engineers (meddlers) and various Marxists - “Progressive”. There is nothing “progressive” about wanting to go back to powerful governments, when people had no rights. Properly, they should be called “Regressives”. The single most progressive political document ever written was the US Constitution, complete with the Bill of Rights. Most of what happened afterwards was slow deterioration — generations of politicians stealing more and more power.