SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E_K_S who wrote (71484)11/1/2022 12:19:42 AM
From: Madharry  Respond to of 78702
 
cio reporting results and having a conference call on november 7. should be an interesting listen.



To: E_K_S who wrote (71484)11/1/2022 12:01:32 PM
From: Paul Senior1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Spekulatius

  Respond to of 78702
 
CIO. I'll go for some here too.

As I understand it, company sold its San Diego real estate - for over $500M cash. Stock subsequently moved up to about a double. With the cash, the company bought office buildings in "good/growing" markets. However that being "Office buildings" - ugh), the stock fell back to about $9-10. The properties bought were new buildings, and the deals apparently closed around 12/21.

Office buildings have been out of favor for maybe several years now with the work-at-home effect. So I will guess the new office buildings CIO bought were bought with market supply/demand prices reflecting that. And now it's about a year later, and office properties are still not seen positively by the market, I believe. While CIO stock has dropped in half, is it likely - I ask myself - that the value of CIO's $500M property buys have also fallen this much in a year? I'll say no, and guess that these new buildings are maybe worth almost as much now, a year later, as when bought. To me this would make CIO's stated book value as solid number.

So some margin of safety there, a greater than 7% dividend yield, and a management team that shown it's willing to make big changes to try to enhance shareholder value.



To: E_K_S who wrote (71484)11/1/2022 1:34:47 PM
From: Grommit1 Recommendation

Recommended By
E_K_S

  Respond to of 78702
 
Office REIT data

here is some CIO data with some other office reits. the P/FFOs are related to the debt levels. except for CIO. This rule holds for more than just the REITs listed here and appears to be a general rule. (i.e. also true for FSP, BXP, ESRT, KRC, PGRE...)

Yellow -- office reits with higher leverage have P/FFO around 5.
Green -- reits with lower leverage have P/FFO 7-9.
except CIO - an outlier -- higher debt but PE with the lower debt group.
So there are better value plays. I'd also I'd prefer more substantial mkt cap size.