Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (193111)	11/2/2022 5:39:05 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219883

just opened ultimately the toll payers shall pay should it be the case of no toll payers, the highway sits there looking pretty and the cost inflates away by the EU, paid to China late ultimately the highway links Montenegro / Serbia to Europe notice how the naysayers are saying all sorts of 'things' that falls under overblown, too early to tell, etc etc, as the project' most important section, whilst complete, must still be built out. $1B is a decimal point, as far as infrastructures go, and is enabling. 42 km should not have taken 7-years except in lands where foreign influences interfere w/ progress Montenegro / Balkans abandoned by EU and Russia except as weapons testing ground, akin to Africa

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (193111)	11/2/2022 6:08:24 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219883

two academic looks I have not watched yet and am doing now now now no idea what said but seems legit as far as intellectual rigour goes dunno, agnostic

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (193111)	11/2/2022 7:19:02 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219883

re Message 34063207 seems balanced, essentially China policy is 'come get it if you want, and if what you want is talking politics, can go elsewhere' so it shall eventually be determined by realities as opposed to narratives at many levels from all angles, ala whether Africa and EU subsidiaries should say "no" or not regimes must solve problems else they are changed let's watch how the game is played and plays out amongst EU (amalgamation of sovereignty, in broad strokes), USA (bases, essentially), Russia (anti-bases, pretty much), and China (business, more or less) in the Balkans and southern Europe ... and how the gamings go in Africa and Middle East, full spectrum, from resources to markets, and everything else in between