SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)11/5/2022 7:01:33 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<Canada orders China to divest from country’s mining companies>>

am going to take a guess, that

- it shall be difficult for PWM to get financing to ever start mining, and never mind who would process the output except you-know-who



- Lithium Chile might have its Chile and Argentina concessions ripped out, or just redomiciled, to be inherited by you-know-who, assuming its stuff is any good

- Ultra Lithium, same same

finance.yahoo.com


finance.yahoo.com


finance.yahoo.com





To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)11/5/2022 7:10:20 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<Canada orders China to divest from country’s mining companies>>

good read for backgrounder re the Game of Go en.wikipedia.org

Boots on the ground enables friends on the ground, and friends help friends, etc etc etc

In any poker game, a game that is different from Go, if one does not know who the mark is, then likely ... well, best stop there :0)))))))

There is an ancient Chinese saying, ????????? , roughly translates to "the monk can run away but the temple cannot", meaning one can twist and shout, run and hide, but all still in the bag



geopoliticalmonitor.com

Lithium Monopoly in the Making? Beijing Expands in the Lithium Triangle

By Daniel A. Peraza



China aims to expand its influence in the “Lithium Triangle” as a component of a broader campaign to construct a near-monopoly in the global lithium market. The Lithium Triangle, comprising Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile, accounts for approximately 56% percent of global lithium supply. Beijing’s acquisition of multiple Argentinian, Chilean, and Bolivia lithium mining operations enables China to dominate regional lithium operations. From 2018- 2020, China invested approximately $16 billion on mining projects in the Lithium Triangle and will likely continue to invest in the region.

China’s economic involvement within Argentina’s lithium mining industry allows Beijing to establish a stronger position in the global lithium market which can undermine future U.S mining operations within the region. Argentina harbors 21% of global lithium reserves. On 17 May 2021, China’s Ganfeng Lithium and Argentina’s mining ministry signed a memorandum of understanding, securing Chinese-backed development of a lithium battery manufacturing plant in Jujuy province. On 4 February 2022, Chinese Zijin Mining Group funded construction of a $380 million lithium refinery plant in the Tres Quebradas project. On 11 July 2022, Chinese Ganfeng Lithium secured $964 million for the acquisition of Lithium mining company Argentinian Lithea. On 28 July 2022, China’s Zangge Mining and Argentina’s Miner Ultra commenced investment collaboration, investing $290 million toward the Laguna Verde Project. These developments will expand China’s economic influence in Argentina’s lithium sector.

China’s acquisition of Chilean mining company Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile’s (SQM) shares and mining contracts enables Beijing to maintain economic dominance within the Chilean lithium mining industry. Chile harbors 20% share of the global mining production of lithium. On October 4th, 2018, Chile’s antitrust court “Tribunal de la libre Competencia” granted Chinese mining corporation Tanqui a 24% acquisition in SQM. Chile’s SQM manages one of the largest lithium production operations in the world. On 14 January 2022, Chile’s Ministry of Mining granted China’s Build Your Dreams Company a $61 million contract. The acquisition of the mining contract enables China’s exploitation of 80,000 tons of lithium; this latest expansion, representing 1.8% of China’s known lithium reserves, will further embolden Chinese resource dominance in global lithium markets. In 2021, China imported 39% of Chile’s lithium.

Beijing’s economic cooperation within Bolivia’s mining industry expands China’s presence in the state with the world’s largest untapped lithium reserves. Bolivia contains 21 million tons of untapped ‘white gold.’ On 18 September 2016, Bolivia pledged to export 10,000 tons of processed Lithium to China by 2021. On 17 May 2018, Bolivia awarded a Chinese engineering firm $96 million in construction funds for the development of a lithium carbonate plant. On 6 February 2019, Bolivia’s state lithium company Yacimientos de Litio (YLB) commenced joint ventures with China’s Xinjiang TBEA Group. China’s TBEA Group acquired a 49% stake in the YLB for $2.3 billion. The deal secured the development of several lithium extraction and processing plants, located in Bolivia’s Pastos Grandes and Coipasa region. The development of Chinese-Bolivian lithium production plants may produce 146,000 tons of lithium annually. China’s strategic investment solidifies Bolivian economic cooperation and secures a presence within the estimated nine million tons of untapped lithium reserves in the Salar de Uyuni salt flat.

Beijing’s economic dominance within the Lithium Triangle potentially threatens the U.S defense industrial base, affecting lithium supplies for military hardware. From 2016-2019, Argentine and Chilean exports accounted for 90% of the U.S lithium supply. The U.S defense industrial base relies on a steady lithium supply; for example, a majority of U.S military weaponry, navigational, and communication systems utilize lithium ion-batteries. Chinese dominance within lithium markets could enable China to manipulate lithium output to the detriment of the U.S. and further empower Beijing in this crucial market. Chinese companies’ purchase of top lithium mining operations within Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile may deliberately dismantle future U.S economic and trade prospects within the Lithium Triangle. China already controls approximately 76% of global lithium-ion battery manufacturing, and future investments will only further solidify its dominance in global lithium markets.

The views expressed in this article belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of Geopoliticalmonitor.com



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)11/5/2022 7:14:59 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<Canada orders China to divest from country’s mining companies>>

the temple remains in the bag, and the juniors would be hard pressed to sell output to processor, and the processor must sell output to highest bidder, etc etc and the highest bidder is invariably the one with the largest market share, else doing something wrong

china ev battery global production



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)11/5/2022 7:21:21 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<Canada orders China to divest from country’s mining companies>>

Amongst vectors including rare earths, lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite, and and and policy, market, and diplomacy (as opposed to bombs and lectures), the temple is in the bag

Re CATL and its expansion CATL expansion



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)11/5/2022 7:25:21 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<Canada orders China to divest from country’s mining companies>>

no comment / narration

except to ask, 'what has your elected officials been doing with your dollars and the printed dollars, besides surveying and then de-camping Afghanistan?

:0)))))))

greencarcongress.com

Baker Institute report: China has positioned itself as a gatekeeper to the energy transition; nickel case study
21 April 2022

The global push to convert the world to electric vehicles will cause supply chain complexities that could undermine the alternative energy transition in the United States, according to a new report from Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

The detailed report— Need Nickel? How Electrifying Transport and Chinese Investment are Playing Out in Indonesia—focuses on nickel as a critical mineral, but has implications for the broader minerals and materials supply chains needed for broad-scale energy transition.

The success of the global march toward “decarbonization” depends on the complicated logistics that support it, along with the convoluted strategies that form its underpinning. The process of shoring up supply chains is a prerequisite to sound strategic planning: Without robust supply chains, even the most elaborate blueprint for implementation will prove ostentatious in practice. The global push for electrification, as worthy a cause as it may be, is not immune to such realities.
Indeed, the global push to electrify is creating new tensions and complexities that, if not properly managed and mitigated, will undermine the much-discussed “energy transition.” Emerging markets and developing countries are central to the “decarb” and electrification push, and are themselves maneuvering to attain advanced country status and a higher quality of life for their citizens. Minerals and the materials derived from them are at the heart of energy transition strategies, and emerging markets and developing economies are the overwhelming providers. The industrialized world brushes these realities under the rug in favor of self-aggrandizing agenda-setting, and, in doing so, engenders critical supply risks and the potential for further environmental degradation.
Widely ignored, although gaining attention, is China’s strategic positioning as a crucial gatekeeper to several key “green” technologies, including battery energy storage to support electric vehicles (EVs)—specifically, battery electric vehicles (BEVs)—along with stationary storage for power grids. China also dominates in other technologies including wind and solar components, controls, sensors, and communications—a gamut of industrial equipment, including much that is pertinent for defense.
—Baker Institute report Need Nickel?


While Russia holds significant leverage in influencing oil and gas prices, it pales in comparison to China’s position in several strategic industries critical to the energy transition, says report author Michelle Michot Foss, fellow in energy and materials at the Baker Institute.

Nickel is critical to battery-powered vehicles; nickel sulfate is a key ingredient in cathode precursors for the lithium-ion batteries they use. Indonesia is home to the largest nickel reserves in the world, and the privately owned Tsingshan Holding Group has made significant investments in the country.

Based in China, Tsingshan operates the world’s largest nickel syndicate—including nickel ore mining, nickel refining, purification, ferronickel production, crude steel production, logistics, port management, trading and transportation.

(The report notes that on 8 March 2022, the London Metals Exchange (LME) abruptly halted trading in nickel, which had reached $100,000 per tonne. The LME events were a consequence of positions taken by Tsingshan based on expectations of falling prices. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and other recent developments, not least post-pandemic recovery, undermined Tsingshan’s short position, forcing the company to purchase nickel at increasing prices to cover the positions, and the LME to increase margin requirements for market participants. The extreme disruption in nickel trading and markets, while unusual, is an important signal for materials insecurities that lie ahead, the authors said. )

Between 2010 and 2021, worldwide nickel usage grew almost 90%. This surge occurred mostly in China, driven by steel manufacturing. Batteries currently comprise about 7% of nickel demand, but this could increase to one-third of nickel consumption by 2040, which could create a disruptive supply chain environment for the US, according to the report.

Global Nickel Trade and Chinese Dominance



Source: CES worldwide minerals trade visualization, bakerinstitute.org.

China’s status as a battery gatekeeper—along with its stationary storage capabilities in power grids and its emergence as the “factory to the world” on energy, non-fuel minerals and other key commodities—presents major challenges according to Foss. Its model of economic “soft power” has crept into commodity warehouses, EV factories and everything in between, giving Chinese entities significant control over several links of these critical supply chains.

Government incentives can boost electric vehicle sales in the US, she said, but policies to incentivize EV adoption will still be disrupted by inadequate infrastructure. The US faces a number of problems, including unstable raw material supply chains, insufficient battery manufacturing capacity and a lack of infrastructure to power EVs or supplement intermittent supplies of wind and solar power.

There are also unanswered questions about how to even finance electrification or road construction and maintenance given lost revenues from fuels taxes, Foss said.

In an era of unparalleled geopolitical friction, how China’s dominance will affect emissions reduction goals in places like the United States and Europe remains to be seen. … Thus, the success of EVs, much less anything else in the energy transition hopper, cannot be divorced from the geopolitics of the day. China’s inordinate influence over natural resource-producing and -exporting countries could translate to leverage in its revisionist power plays.
Accompanying the vigorous drive toward alternative energy technologies is the unavoidable pressure on the global supply of critical base metals. Nickel is no exception. In our report and case study we examine tensions in nickel supply and value chains within the context of broad aspirations to electrify transport.
—“Need Nickel?”



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)11/5/2022 7:26:46 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<Canada orders China to divest from country’s mining companies>>

china control cobalt



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)11/5/2022 7:33:56 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<China's Semiconductor Industry 'Decapitated Overnight': What 'Annihilation Looks Like'>>

... is outrageous. Would say the deep-state had been asleep, and re-shoring / friend-shoring shall be exceedingly difficult if can be done, very expensive

Given the amounts required to fight the Russians in Ukraine, your taxes shall have to go up, the opposite of down, a not-good for an arguable good-good. You decide. Am agnostic

In any case, perhaps Canada and Australia shall boot China from their respective domestic / or listed foreign junior graphite explorers soonest :0)))))

kitco.com


china control graphite



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)11/6/2022 6:08:28 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
slightly bearish, seems to be all happening, and suddenly accelerating, <<Decapitation ... Annihilation>>

medically-speaking, an un-good

(1) readmsg.aspx Elliott Management Letter

(2) Gold ... Zombie Apocalypse ... and and and
When the zombie apocalypse comes, even gold might not be enough to save you.

un-good un-good, because that is not supposed to be part of the deal we made !!!


(3) ... and therefore I am guessing that the empire must do something absolutely totally dramatic

bloomberg.com

Even Central Banks Are Buying Gold for the Zombie Apocalypse

Governments in developing economies are building up their bullion holdings as trust breaks down.

David Fickling7 November 2022 at 05:30 GMT+8



All that glitters.

Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/BloombergThe instruction manual for surviving a zombie apocalypse is pretty straightforward. Once you’ve kitted out your bunker with canned goods and firearms, get a supply of bullion. You’ll need it to buy bullets and bribe your way out of a death fight in Thunderdome.

That’s a line of thinking you might associate with cranky gold bugs, but it’s not a million miles away from the rationale behind fund flows in the precious metals market right now — and nations are in the driving seat. Central banks bought 400 metric tons of gold in the September quarter, the World Gold Council reported this week. That’s a record inflow on a par with what they’d purchase over a whole year in normal times.

All That GlittersCentral banks in emerging economies are the world's biggest gold buyers

Source: World Gold Council



In the notoriously opaque world of government gold trading, it’s not always immediately clear who the biggest buyers are. Monetary authorities are such big players that they can distort the entire market by showing their hands, one reason that prices plummeted in the 1990s and 2000s when some of the European central banks sold in unison.

There is one obvious factor in common between the declared buyers, however: All are from nations facing serious problems. Turkey, whose lira slumped 52% over the year through September, added 95.5 tons to its gold holdings in the same period. Egypt bought 44.8 tons while its pound fell by 20%. India’s 40.5-ton purchase was matched by an 8.7% weakening of the rupee. Iraq’s dinar is fixed against the dollar, but credit-default swaps protecting against non-payment of its debts surged to nearly 9% in September, even after it bought 33.9 tons of the metal.

That’s a curious situation. Stacking up bullion in the central bank’s vault has long been a powerful signal to investors that a government is going to be a prudent and reliable borrower. No amount of gold buying, though, is going to convince anyone that the fiscally incontinent Egyptian government is a good credit. US 10-year Treasuries, currently yielding 4.2%, also look a much better proposition than a metal that pays no interest, especially now that gold is no longer outperforming the total returns on government debt.

Choose Your PoisonThe end of the long bond bull market in 2020 caused gold to outperform the total return on US government debt. They're now moving in parallel again

Source: Bloomberg

Note: Rebased. Nov. 4, 2022=100.



Bullion does have one crucial advantage: unlike bonds, it doesn’t bind you into a relationship with an unreliable counterparty. US government debt was at one time the hardest form of currency, a true risk-free investment. Then, in February, coordinated sanctions on Russia’s central bank vaporized most of the $498 billion in reserves sitting on its balance sheet. The European Union is now looking at using those funds to pay for the rebuilding of Ukraine, Bloomberg News reported last week. In a world where you can trust no one, it makes sense to bulletproof yourself with metal.

Looked at through that lens, the purchases by Turkey and Egypt come into focus. Though both nations are key US allies, they’ve seen relations deteriorate substantially over the past decade as their governments have found themselves more simpatico with rising authoritarian powers. The path ahead for international relations is more uncertain now than it has been in decades. It makes sense in that world for central bank reserves not to be too heavily committed to ties with any one country.

Subscribe to ElementsA daily guide to the energy and commodities markets with Javier Blas and Bloomberg’s leading columnists.

Sign up to this newsletter

The behavior of those smaller nations is a clue to the identity of the biggest buyers in the market, too. Declared purchasers only account for about 120 tons of the 400 tons that central banks bought in the September quarter, but you can get a good idea of the other candidates by looking at which countries have been racking up the largest current account surpluses. (Such surpluses, after all, are the balances which governments use to buy their foreign exchange reserves.) Outside of Europe, which stopped large-scale bullion purchases decades ago, the biggest players are all nations whose ties with the US are fraying by the day: China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia.

Follow the MoneySome of the world's biggest current account surpluses are being run up in authoritarian countries whose relations with the US are worsening

Source: IMF

Note: 2022 data.



The dollar’s role as the world’s preeminent medium of exchange remains unassailable. Some 88% of currency transactions involved the greenback this year, according to the Bank for International Settlements. Still, its share in central bank reserves has been falling rapidly, from 65% at the end of 2016 to 59% earlier this year.

That’s almost certainly a result of Washington’s increasingly muscular view of its currency dominance in recent years, whether it means coercing French banks to obey US sanctions, forcing Hong Kong politicians to be paid with stacks of banknotes, or blockading Russia’s reserves from the global economy.

Going Out of StyleThe US dollar has been losing ground as a share of central bank foreign exchange reserves

Source: IMF



Such a situation makes gold look like an appealing alternative. Even then, though, there are risks. Venezuela is currently three years into a series of legal cases in London about whether its de facto president or his political rival should control its bullion reserves in the city’s bank vaults. So far, opposition leader Juan Guaido, who’s recognized by the UK government, seems to be winning. When the zombie apocalypse comes, even gold might not be enough to save you.



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)7/31/2023 11:30:05 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<decapitated … annihilation>>

Rule #2 of war by any means, fractal scaled up or down, is to occupy the countrysides to lay siege to the cities …

About which I have the autographed book, titled “on protracted (endurance) war” authored by someone named Mao



bloomberg.com

US, Europe Are Growing Alarmed by China’s Rush Into Legacy Chips
China is building more plants than others despite US sanctions Officials are worried about impact on domestic chip plans

By Jenny Leonard, Ian King, and Alberto Nardelli

July 31, 2023 at 7:14 AM EDT

US and European officials are growing increasingly concerned about China’s accelerated push into the production of older-generation semiconductors and are debating new strategies to contain the country’s expansion.

President Joe Biden implemented broad controls over China’s ability to secure the kind of advanced chips that power artificial-intelligence models and military applications. But Beijing responded by pouring billions into factories for the so-called legacy chips that haven’t been banned. Such chips are still essential throughout the global economy, critical components for everything from smartphones and electric vehicles to military hardware.

That’s sparked fresh fears about China’s potential influence and triggered talks of further reining in the Asian nation, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because the deliberations are private. The US is determined to prevent chips from becoming a point of leverage for China, the people said.

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo alluded to the problem during a panel discussion last week at the American Enterprise Institute. “The amount of money that China is pouring into subsidizing what will be an excess capacity of mature chips and legacy chips — that’s a problem that we need to be thinking about and working with our allies to get ahead of,” she said.

While there’s no timeline for action to be taken and information is still being gathered, all options are on the table, according to a senior Biden administration official. A US National Security Council spokeswoman declined to comment, while a European Commission spokesperson did not immediately provide comments.



Global Chip Plants Under ConstructionNew factories and major expansions coming online 2022-2026

Source: SEMI World Fab Forecast as of March

The most advanced semiconductors are those produced using the thinnest etching technology, with 3-nanometers state of the art today. Legacy chips are typically considered those made with 28-nm equipment or above, technology introduced more than a decade ago.

Senior EU and US officials are concerned about Beijing’s drive to dominate this market for both economic and security reasons, the people said. They worry Chinese companies could dump their legacy chips on global markets in the future, driving foreign rivals out of business like in the solar industry, they said.

Western companies may then become dependent on China for these semiconductors, the people said. Buying such critical tech components from China may create national security risks, especially if the silicon is needed in defense equipment.

“The United States and its partners should be on guard to mitigate nonmarket behavior by China’s emerging semiconductor firms,” researchers Robert Daly and Matthew Turpin wrote in a recent essay for the Hoover Institution think tank at Stanford University. “Over time, it could create new US or partner dependencies on China-based supply chains that do not exist today, impinging on US strategic autonomy.”

The importance of legacy chips was highlighted by supply shocks that roiledcompanies at the height of the Covid pandemic, including Apple Inc. and carmakers. Chip shortages cost businesses hundreds of billions of dollars in lost sales. Simple components, such as power management circuits, are essential for products like smartphones and electric vehicles, as well as military gear like missiles and radar.

The US and Europe are trying to build up their own domestic chip production to decrease reliance on Asia. Governments have set aside public money to support local factories, including the Biden administration’s $52 billion for the CHIPS and Science Act.

But domestic producers may be reluctant to invest in facilities that will have to compete with heavily subsidized Chinese plants. The Biden administration and its allies are gauging the willingness of Western companies to invest in such projects before they decide what action to take.

While the US rules introduced last October slowed down China’s development of advanced chipmaking capabilities, they left largely untouched the country’s ability to use techniques older than 14-nanometers. That has led Chinese firms to construct new plants faster than anywhere else in the world. They are forecast to build 26 fabs through 2026 that use 200-millimeter and 300-mm wafers, according to the trade group SEMI. That compares with 16 fabs for the Americas.

Heavy investments have allowed Chinese companies to keep supplying the West, despite rising tensions between Washington and Beijing. China’s chipmaking champion, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp., got about 20% of last year’s sales from US-based clients, including Qualcomm Inc., despite being blacklisted by the American government.

“When you think about electrification of mobility, think about the energy transition, the IoT in the industrial space, the roll-out of the telecommunication infrastructure, battery technology, that’s all — that’s the sweet spot of mid-critical and mature semiconductor,” Peter Wennink, chief executive officer of Dutch chipmaking equipment supplier ASML Holding NV, told analysts in mid-July. “And that’s where China without any exception is leading.”

— With Jillian Deutsch, Yuan Gao, Jane Pong, Katharina Rosskopf, and Peter Elstrom

Sent from my iPhone



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)7/31/2023 11:41:35 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Re <<decapitated … annihilation>>


Do you see the setup or the picture?


Interpretation of the chart, that the fight is over before it starts, in the very best tradition of the game of “Go” as in go-go-go


:0)))





To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)8/6/2023 7:32:17 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Following up to Message 34367136 <<decapitated … annihilation>>



Spoiler: neo-people f*cked up in mathematics

got words from China, People's Republic (PRC), and Republic (ROC), the the chip war is so far just and only positioning, and not positioning for stalemate, but for resolution should the 'go go go' become 'go-now'

china PRC gets all the chips needed from China ROC, except in the cases of a few but growing entities-listees, even as non-associated intermediaries step in to help smooth the flow of the more useful chips

China chip-using supercomputing news flow gone quiet even more active than ever, using whatever and every kinds of chips, but just gone quiet

alt-supply-chains in place as backstop to actual breakout of chip war

it would seem neo-people who typically do not and cannot understand technology, has been running the chip war as they ran the Ukraine war, for not-stalemate-except-by-spin

exciting

1. USA has position to stop shipment of USA-IP-content (higher-end) chips shipment to PRC, sort of, that would cause precision strikes against specific companies, and by implication, specific sectors - China players reluctant to base certain products on USA-IP chips at the design phase, and developing own whilst phasing out USA-IP-content

2. PRC has position to stop shipment of China-made (lower-end) chips to USA, sort of, that should cause massive and wide-spread damage against the Nasdaq / NYSE / true-GDP and all chip-using companies, and by explication, the economy - potential Ford F150 pickup trucks all-assembled except a few really cheap but suddenly valuable chips

3. PRC supported by strategic moves in the periodic-table-elemental war as opposed to the simple-minded chip war, in position to cause a lot of consequences to happen and happen without backstop(s) on the receiving ends - proof of concept be Germanium and Gallium

4. Next up, China PRC doubling down on investments in the lower-end chip biz to dominate the 'country-side' to lay siege to the 'urban centers', making it prohibitively dangerous for non-PRC competitors to step into the country-side low-end chips and forcing strategic withdraws

5. The threat of breakout of actual chip war, part Hot, makes would-be investors except Chinas PRC and ROC hesitate to expand production of all chips because of potential revenue shortfall of 25-30%. ROC players ... scratch that ... TSMC is certain that chip war shall go cold, even as machinery moat going high, and that is good-good for TSMC

6. Chip Machinery War shall be resolved by innovation, whilst Chip War cannot likely happen. Fine line, but there is a line. On this front there is time, because the higher end chips whilst more lucrative, is numerically less, and does not support the chip industry, even as the lower-end chips snarfed up by PRC investment in already ok machinery

Open source diagram below for show & tell is mostly valid, and if Team USA wishes to scrounge for useful chips from captured refrigerators and blow apart washing machines, along side the scavenging Russians, for use in everything useful Ford F150 trucks, nice-to-have Mustang Coupes, and use-less F35s, trigger hot chip war from current positioning should work - same goes for servers, etc etc etc, per Nike, 'Just Do It' and FAFO (fuck around and find out) Ukraine protocol.

Recommendations: Gold and Silver. There is still quite a bit of time, as positioning takes time.






To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)8/6/2023 11:29:15 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Following up to Message 34374776
<<periodic-table-elemental war>>

... and no, victory by Christmas unlikely, and also unlikely by November 2024, and no, the issue is also likely beyond what tycoon Trump might manage


I correct the last sentence, ala globalisation 2.0, and yes, GetMoreGold in order given likely structural inflation tsunami to sweep across global scape should Ukraine no go just right
The announcement of these restrictions has only highlighted the impotence for the U.S. and other nations to reduce import dependence and diversify supply chains of key minerals and technologies.


zerohedge.com

Visualizing America's Import-Reliance Of Key Minerals

The push towards a more sustainable future requires various key minerals to build the infrastructure of the green economy. However, the U.S. is heavily reliant on nonfuel mineral imports causing potential vulnerabilities in the nation’s supply chains.

Specifically, the U.S. is 100% reliant on imports for at least 12 key minerals deemed critical by the government, with China being the primary import source for many of these along with many other critical minerals.

In the following infographic, Visual Capitalist's Niccolo Conte and Pernia Jamshed use data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to visualize America’s import dependence for 30 different key nonfuel minerals along with the nation that the U.S. primarily imports each mineral from.

[url=][/url]

U.S. Import Reliance, by Mineral

While the U.S. mines and processes a significant amount of minerals domestically, in 2022 imports still accounted for more than half of the country’s consumption of 51 nonfuel minerals. The USGS calculates a net import reliance as a percentage of apparent consumption, showing how much of U.S. demand for each mineral is met through imports.

Of the most important minerals deemed by the USGS, the U.S. was 95% or more reliant on imports for 13 different minerals, with China being the primary import source for more than half of these.

MineralNet Import Reliance as Percentage of ConsumptionPrimary Import Source (2018-2021)
Arsenic100%???? China
Fluorspar100%???? Mexico
Gallium100%???? China
Graphite (natural)100%???? China
Indium100%???? Republic of Korea
Manganese100%???? Gabon
Niobium100%???? Brazil
Scandium100%???? Europe
Tantalum100%???? China
Yttrium100%???? China
Bismuth96%???? China
Rare Earths (compounds and metals)95%???? China
Titanium (metal)95%???? Japan
Antimony83%???? China
Chromium83%???? South Africa
Tin77%???? Peru
Cobalt76%???? Norway
Zinc76%???? Canada
Aluminum (bauxite)75%???? Jamaica
Barite75%???? China
Tellerium75%???? Canada
Platinum66%???? South Africa
Nickel56%???? Canada
Vanadium54%???? Canada
Germanium50%???? China
Magnesium50%???? Israel
Tungsten50%???? China
Zirconium50%???? South Africa
Palladium26%???? Russia
Lithium25%???? Argentina

These include rare earths (a group of 17 nearly indistinguishable heavy metals with similar properties) which are essential in technology, high-powered magnets, electronics, and industry, along with natural graphite which is found in lithium-ion batteries.

These are all on the U.S. government’s critical mineral list which has a total of 50 minerals, and the U.S. is 50% or more import reliant for 43 of these minerals.

Some other minerals on the official list which the U.S. is 100% reliant on imports for are arsenic, fluorspar, indium, manganese, niobium, and tantalum, which are used in a variety of applications like the production of alloys and semiconductors along with the manufacturing of electronic components like LCD screens and capacitors.

China’s Gallium and Germanium Restrictions

America’s dependence on imports for various minerals has resulted in a new challenge resulting from China’s announced export restrictions on gallium and germanium that took effect August 1st, 2023. The U.S. is 100% import dependent for gallium and 50% import dependent for germanium.

These restrictions are seen as a retaliation against U.S. and EU sanctions on China which have restricted the export of chips and chipmaking equipment.

Both gallium and germanium are used in the production of transistors and semiconductors along with solar panels and cells, and these export restrictions present an additional hurdle for critical U.S. supply chains of various technologies that include LED lights and fiber-optic systems used for high-speed data transmission.

The restrictions also affect the European Union, which imports 71% of its gallium and 45% of its germanium from China. It’s another stark reminder to the world of China’s dominance in the production and processing of many key minerals.

The announcement of these restrictions has only highlighted the importance for the U.S. and other nations to reduce import dependence and diversify supply chains of key minerals and technologies.



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)8/7/2023 7:25:41 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Stuff happening, and adults speaking up, apparently, so that none would get <<decapitated>>, at least not <<overnight>> by a tsunami of periodic-table sanctions across the entirety of tech metals scape

in any case, the step-on-it-and-power-through is not a strategy but a hail-mary

An influential South Korean legislator has strongly criticised Washington’s interventions in the global semiconductor industry, in a sign of the disquiet in Seoul over US efforts to corral Asian allies into its economic security agenda.

ft.com

South Korean politician urges US to abandon China chip strategy

Former Samsung executive Yang Hyang-ja warns of risk of damaging relations with Asian allies

Yang Hyang-ja, a member of South Korea’s parliament, said countries could form an alliance against the US if it continued with its ‘America First’ and anti-China policies © Office of Yang Hyang-ja/Handout

An influential South Korean legislator has strongly criticised Washington’s interventions in the global semiconductor industry, in a sign of the disquiet in Seoul over US efforts to corral Asian allies into its economic security agenda.

Yang Hyang-ja, a former chip engineer and Samsung executive who chaired a ruling party committee on South Korea’s semiconductor competitiveness until early this year, said that measures to curb China’s ability to access or produce advanced chips risked damaging relations with its Asian allies.

“If [Washington] continues to try to punish other nations and to pass bills and implement ‘America First’ policies in an unpredictable manner, other countries could form an alliance against the US,” Yang told the Financial Times in an interview.

“The US is the strongest nation in the world,” she added. “It should consider more of humanity’s common values. Appearing to use its strength as a weapon is not desirable.”

The US has passed legislation offering tens of billions of dollars in subsidies to non-Chinese chipmakers to increase semiconductor production in the US, in exchange for restrictions on their ability to upgrade or expand their facilities in China.

The Biden administration has also imposed sweeping export controls on critical chip manufacturing tools to China and prohibited US nationals and companies from offering direct or indirect support to Chinese companies involved in advanced chip manufacturing.

But there are concerns in Seoul that the US measures will provoke a backlash from Beijing, disrupting finely calibrated supply chains and threatening profits.

Lee Jae-myung, the leader of South Korea’s leftwing opposition Democratic party, has accused the conservative government of harming the country’s economic and security interests by siding too closely with the US and Japan against China and Russia.

Yang, a former Democratic party member who formed her own technocratic party, Hope of Korea, in June, acknowledged that “US tech war measures are not harming our semiconductor industry yet because sanctions against China could actually reduce output, leading to higher prices”.

But she added: “The more the US sanctions China, the harder China will try to make rapid technological progress. China will provide more national support for the goal. Then it will pose a crisis to South Korea, given China’s abundant talent and raw materials.”

“The US should abandon its current approach of trying to get something out of shaking and breaking the global value chain,” she said.

Yang added that the US had benefited from South Korean and Taiwanese expertise in manufacturing memory and processor chips respectively, saying it was “trying to demolish the status quo through sanctions”.

Many analysts said the US measures actually helped South Korean chipmakers by hampering the progress of their Chinese competitors.

The biggest long-term threat to South Korea’s semiconductor industry, they said, was not supply chain disruption but the rise of state-backed Chinese rivals such as YMTC, which has made rapid progress in closing the technological gap with leading Korean chipmakers in the Nand flash-memory sector.

Troy Stangarone, senior director at the Korea Economic Institute of America, notes that US tech giant Apple had considered using YMTC’s Nand flash-memory chips for the current iPhone 14, until political pressure from US lawmakers forced it to abandon the option.

“The Apple-YMTC episode demonstrated both how far the Chinese have come in the Nand memory sector, and how Korean companies have benefited from US intervention,” said Stangarone.

The FT has also reported that US export controls helped thwart an alleged attempt by a renowned South Korean semiconductor expert to build a “copycat” memory chip plant in China. According to Korean prosecutors, the plant “would have caused irrecoverable losses to the [Korean] semiconductor industry”.

Yang accepted that the US-China tech war had bought South Korea time to develop its own technologies but added that the country’s semiconductor industry was in a “very precarious situation”.

The lawmaker, who was instrumental in passing the K-Chips Act this year to boost tax credits for companies investing in chip manufacturing in South Korea, said the country had to address what she described as neglect of its own engineering talent.

“In Taiwan, technicians get treated better than lawyers and judges. But in Korea, they are not treated well,” said Yang, who is also a member of a cross-party committee on cutting-edge technologies.

“Smart Korean students want to become doctors, dentists or oriental medicine practitioners rather than to become engineers,” she said. “Only technology can set us free from all these geopolitical problems.”



To: bull_dozer who wrote (193224)8/9/2023 12:32:41 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217608
 
Following up readmsg.aspx

<<Following up to Message 34367136 <<decapitated … annihilation>>>> in respect to ...
Spoiler: neo-people f*cked up in mathematics
... the below mathematics look right, and let us see what the Team Japan is willing to do and not-do as staring into sunsetting / seppuku / de-industrialisation abyss

Reminder Message 34367115
Rule #2 of war by any means, fractal scaled up or down, is to occupy the countrysides to lay siege to the cities …

At some point, mathematically-speaking, it would be time, am guessing, to phase-change from defence, to defensive-attack, to attack-defence, and then to 'let's finish this' / a/k/a 'explosive surge', by one or the other side, hopefully peacefully, and end conflicts. Agnostic. Let's watch.

I recommend 2025 - 2028 to be set up for global cooperative build-back-better re-globalisation 2.0, else un-good.

Spoiler: Still, Nikon expects its lithography machine unit sales to grow this fiscal year to March on expanded sales to non-core customers it did not name. Chinese companies have been stockpiling chip equipment as the US tightens restrictions on China’s ability to access cutting-edge technologies.

bloomberg.com

Nikon Dives Most on Record as Global Chip Outlook Darkens

- Nikon supplies mature chipmaking machines to Intel, TSMC

- Chip industry sales have been hit by glut, economic headwinds

NIKON CORP
1,601.50JPY –13.03%

By Debby Wu

9 August 2023 at 10:08 GMT+7

Nikon Corp. had their biggest intraday drop on record after the camera and chip equipment maker reported a steep fall in profit and cut its outlook on precision equipment.

The Japanese company’s stock price tumbled as much as 21% in Tokyo on Wednesday, a day after it said net income fell 78% in the quarter ending in June, hurt by lower utilization rates by customers of its lithography systems, used to make legacy chips.

It also slashed by 20% its full-year profit outlook on its precision equipment segment. Nikon shipped a total of four lithography machines in the June quarter, compared with a total eight last year. The company lifted its full-year sales forecast above consensus and stuck to its profit forecast, however, on solid demand for its mirrorless cameras, coupled with easing of supply chain issues and a weak yen.

“The precision equipment and components segments were much weaker than expected due to North American clients delaying investments and other factors,” Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley analyst Tetsuya Wadaki said in a note to investors.

Nikon supplies major chipmakers including Intel Corp. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., although it’s overshadowed by ASML Holding NV in lithography machines, particularly in the cutting-edge segment.

The global chip industry is grappling with sluggish consumer spending on personal electronics including smartphones and PCs. TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, cut its full-year sales outlook in July, while its smaller US-based rival GlobalFoundries Inc.also provided tepid sales guidance for the current quarter.

Still, Nikon expects its lithography machine unit sales to grow this fiscal year to March on expanded sales to non-core customers it did not name. Chinese companies have been stockpiling chip equipment as the US tightens restrictions on China’s ability to access cutting-edge technologies.

— With Kurt Schussler