Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1379457)	11/9/2022 2:44:01 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571832

>> "Get out the vote" campaigns isn't "stealing," because ultimately it's the decision of each and every voter. Apparently, you don't comprehend what happened. It wasn't a "get out the vote campaign". Keep in mind that half of have already outlawed what Zuckerberg and CTCL did. It was outlawed because it was clearly corrupt. Perhaps you need to spend a little time reading up on the process. When someone pays elections agencies to "get out the blue vote" or "get out the red vote", it is cheating. We cannot have private individuals having ANY hand in deciding which votes are "gotten out". If you do that, you guarantee a win for one side or the other. You DO understand that Zuckerberg, through David Plouffe, had total control of what the $426 Million was spent on, and precisely the street locations and personnel who were hired, EVEN THOUGH THE MONEY WAS SPENT BY STATE AND LOCAL ELECTIONS OPERATIONS. RIGHT? You can see the conflict of interests, NO?