Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (1379832)	11/12/2022 5:48:31 AM
From: golfer72	Respond to of 1579940

Great post. Qench doesnt like facts though as we know

To: i-node who wrote (1379832)	11/14/2022 3:28:58 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579940

OK i-node, let's go over the Georgia case. Brad Raffensperger, a Georgia Republican idiot, agreed to settle a lawsuit Democrats had filed over how signature matches are verified. Raffensperger single-handedly signed away the requirement that mail-in ballots be subject to signature verification requirements. A process that under previous *[correctly implemented]* law rejected around 4.3% of ballots for invalid signatures, was converted into one that resulted in 0.3% of ballots getting rejected. You claim that the Republican way of verifying signatures is the "correct" way while the Democrat way is the "wrong" way, then accuse the Democrats of making the reverse assumption. I don't know which way is the "correct" way. Certainly those who are in power are going to skew the rules in ways that benefit themselves and hurt the other party. It's as old as the American republic itself. In any case, if you want to debate over the rules, that's fine. *But if you don't accept that the election itself is legitimate despite your disagreement over the rules, that's what makes you an election denier.* That's exactly what you are doing when you call the election "stolen," or that the other party is "cheating." You might as well not even subject yourself to the authority of the elected. You might as well not even participate in said "rigged" election. Just call it a "sham" like the RuZZian referen-dumbs in occupied Ukraine. That's what makes you part of the Q. Tenchusatsu