Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1380219)	11/16/2022 12:31:53 AM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By Taro Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577379

which was minor, I don't know how any private individual using their own money to control election processes in the largest cities in the largest cities in the largest swing states in the country -- which in fact determined the outcome of the election -- is "minor". Maybe you can explain that to me because I don't see how you reached that conclusion (along with almost all Red states' legislatures and governors, who were the victims of this outrage). And even PA enacted a ban after realizing what it did to their elections. To be clear, it didn't stop with funding facilities. CTCL/Zuck conveniently had available the personnel to run these facilities. "Power the Polls", a liberal group recruiting poll workers, helped with ballot curing. Leftists "Mikva Challenge" recruited and trained high school aged poll workers. The far left Brennan Center helped with "postelection audits" and "cybersecurity". The rigging was extensive. Pierre Omidyar's "Democracy Fund" designed absentee ballots and voting instructions and created advertising and targeting campaigns. You know who they targeted, RIGHT? Essentially Zuckerberg paid the swing state cities to allow them to control their election process. (In Green Bay, chief of staff to the mayor wrote in an email, "As far as I'm concerned I'm taking all my cues from CTCL [Zuck] and work with those you (CTCL/Zuck) recommend). That is, Zuck called the shots. Utterly outrageous. These are supposed to be "independent", non-partisan operators. I know. That's fair. And Legal. So, it is okay, RIGHT? No, Ten. Not minor. That's why I keep thinking you're not grasping the problem. That you may not be up-to-speed on the problem, or have been influenced by local views, does not change the fact that it was blatant interference and cheating in the election. Remind me, Ten. Are you by any chance in or near Silicon Valley? I kind of forgot what area you are in. If you don't mind my asking.