Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (772261)	11/19/2022 3:30:54 PM
From: didjuneau	4 Recommendations Recommended By garrettjax isopatch Neeka SirWalterRalegh Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

I think Kardona's point is good, but his examples aren't so good. He calls out Barr for going after protesters in Portland after Barr made this statement: Barr's statement is good, but like Obama, he says things that sound good and does the opposite. This is one of the exceptions to what he said that should prove the rule. When city officials allow destruction of property, including Federal buildings, someone has to step in. That shouldn't disprove what Barr said. However, what I heard Barr say yesterday in an NPR interview - that Trump may well deserve more intense DOJ scrutiny for the prelude to the Mar-a-Lago raid... aired at the exact time that Trump was denouncing the Special Counsel appointment... Barr is full of BS and a corrupt man. I am convinced of that now. Apparently it was Bill Barr's father who hired Jeffrey Epstein to work at the elite NY school where Epstein got his start in professional life. Hired without qualifications that any other public school would require. Things that make you go, hmmmm.