Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirWalterRalegh who wrote (772488)	11/22/2022 7:49:59 PM
From: didjuneau	Respond to of 793759

I wouldn't put much stock in the US Marshals until the Courts get the message. Someone has to get the ball rolling with the Courts. A lot of the Federal judges are captured or brain choked with ideology. Brave judges can lead the way also, like the Florida judge did by removing the mask mandates for travel.

To: SirWalterRalegh who wrote (772488)	11/23/2022 1:38:19 AM
From: Jacob Snyder	Respond to of 793759

You are proving my point. The judge himself did not put them in jail. The judge gave the order to federal marshals, who did it. And who has ultimate authority over federal marshals? 1957: The Supreme Court ordered school desegregation. There was a lot of resistance. President Eisenhower ordered the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas. The soldiers stood in classrooms and on street corners, guns in hand, and enforced the Court’s decision. My point is, Eisenhower didn’t have to do that. He could have found 50 plausible excuses for doing nothing. If so, the Court could do nothing. That has happened many times, and it could easily happen again.