Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russet who wrote (26492)	11/26/2022 11:19:36 PM
From: jazzlover2	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Respond to of 37392

Couldn't agree more.

To: russet who wrote (26492)	11/27/2022 7:29:34 AM
From: golfer72	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Respond to of 37392

Alice is a Gruber or a paid troll. Who knows. Maybe both

To: russet who wrote (26492)	11/27/2022 10:52:41 AM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37392

>> Post studies against my assertion that spike protein is a toxic protein << Wait a minute, I thought you were an expert on CO2 and climate, but now you're an expert on all things medical as well ... are you an expert on everything?

To: russet who wrote (26492)	11/27/2022 12:42:21 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh	3 Recommendations Recommended By Cogito Ergo Sum gg cox Terry Maloney Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 37392

You are suggesting that I should just keep silent and accept what the powers that be tell us, I never suggested anything remotely like that. A bit of humour adds to my day so I kind of enjoy reading your posts. Anyhow, since you asked, here is a good article on the safety of the deadly coronavirus spike protein. sciencebasedmedicine.org It is a long article with lots of good references and well worth spending some time reading the article and the references. The article you posted from the New York State Health department was last revised in 2014, well before mRNA vaccines were developed (the process for developing the mRNA method took much longer than 15 years). Here is their latest article on COVID: coronavirus.health.ny.gov The three vaccines that resulted from Operation Warp Speed had all the same safety and efficacy studies as other vaccines before the pandemic. They used the same number of people in the same number of phases. The same safety checks were followed, and the data submitted to independent reviewers was the same as previous vaccines. The only change came from a compressed timeline, and that was possible because of funding to cover any losses previously covered by the manufacturers. historyofvaccines.org Finally I suggest that you run a search on the future of mRNA. This is good one: pharmaphorum.com You ain't seen nothing yet!