Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1381432)	11/30/2022 2:39:50 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583677

Thanks for the info, Wharfie, but I'm a bit suspicious about the numbers ... Power mix includes all PG&E-owned generation, *plus PG&E's power purchases.* It's really easy to increase the mix of "renewables" just by purchasing it from the outside. I care more about total generation. By the way, here's another sentence that gives me pause: This information is preliminary and uses the California Energy Commission methodology. The eligible renewable percentage above doesn’t reflect PG&E’s Renewables Portfolio Standard compliance. *That’s determined using a different methodology.* That tells me that, by controlling the "methodology," one can easily inflate the percentage of "renewable energy" in one's portfolio. Tenchu's fifth rule of partisan politics: Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and Hyperlinks. Tenchusatsu