SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (194452)1/12/2023 5:32:58 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 220172
 
Re <<Bakhmut is an unfortunate designated bloodbath zone for both sides.>>

... might turn out to be the key battle.

Seems to be going more rather than less predictable.

Did not know about the salt mines. Saw pics, and reminds me of computer games, the layers and levels, nooks and crannies

en.wikipedia.org


In the meantime, the conflict appears to be de- a a lot of stuff for all players directly and otherwise.

I hope the Navy Secretary is exaggerating because if such a low-level albeit big-arrow special military operation is exhausting supplies, what would a high-level big-arrow war do?

Just a reminder, conventional non-rocketry munitions production recipe requires antimony Message 34138927 , and rocketry requires earlier and sturdier varieties of chips, of the sort produced in a few places less techie.

zerohedge.com

'Decision To Arm Ourselves Or Arm Ukraine': Navy Secretary Admits Crisis In US Defense Stockpiles

The leader of the US Navy has admitted that the question of dwindling US arms stockpiles in the rush to arm Ukraine, which now stands at over $100 billion in defense aid and counting, is dire enough that some tough unprecedented decisions are coming, which shocked a group of reporters this week.

Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro acknowledged before a naval warfare conference in Arlington, Virginia on Wednesday that the US within the next six months could face a decision of whether to arm itself or Ukraine, due to rapidly depleting stockpiles due to supplying Ukraine

Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Carlos Del Toro, via Flickr/US NavyThe comments were first revealed by Defense One editor Marcus Weisberger on Twitter, and subsequently reported in the publication, and in Newsweek and others. Earlier in the conference the US Navy's Adm. Daryl Caudle put things in stark terms by saying the decision will eventually come down to 'arm ourselves or arm Ukraine'.

Weisberger wrote of the comments: "An admiral alluded to the US needing to choose between itself and Ukraine during a panel at the conference."

Below are the rare, very revealing words of the exchange heard by reporters:

The secretary was asked to respond to comments made at the conference by Adm. Daryl Caudle, commander of U.S. Fleet Forces Command. Caudle, the reporter said, worried that "the Navy might get to the point where it has to make the decision whether it needs to arm itself or arm Ukraine, and has the Navy gotten to that point yet?"
Del Toro replied, "With regards to deliveries of weapons systems for the fight in Ukraine…Yeah, that's always a concern for us. And we monitor that very, very closely. I wouldn't say we're quite there yet, but if the conflict does go on for another six months, for another year, it certainly continues to stress the supply chain in ways that are challenging.”


While most weapons going to Ukraine are from Army stockpiles, it remains that the US recently pledged Sea Sparrow missiles to Ukraine. Additionally US-made Harpoons have long been transferred to Kiev via Denmark.

Navy Secretary Del Toro went on to explain that Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks has been working "very closely with [the defense] industry, to motivate them to find out what their challenges or obstacles are to be able to increase their own production rates," as quoted in the Defense One report.

"It's obvious that you know, these companies have a substantial pipeline for the future," Del Toro added. "They now need to invest in their workforce, as well as the capital investments that they have to make within their own companies to get their production rates up."

Department of Defense stockpiles have been a concern in relation to steadily ramped up arms supplies to Ukraine from within the opening months of the Russian invasion. Additionally other NATO allies are facing this same problem and worry, especially 'neutral' Germany which due to the war dramatically shifted its historic stance on not sending weapons into foreign conflict zones. Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock admitted as early as the summer that "Unfortunately, the situation here is such that we have an absolute deficit in our own stocks."



To: maceng2 who wrote (194452)1/12/2023 5:44:24 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pak73

  Respond to of 220172
 
The situation for my Taiwan compatriots is un-good, for the end of the decade by my reckoning is 2029, smack dab in 2026 / 2032 territory.

Perhaps the Ukraine situation will have been resolved way before that time, and as the date of the article is August 2022, guesstimating delivery on the dot of end-of-decade.

Unclear what old weapon systems would do in the then new new era, but am agnostic, a/k/a let's see

But should the Ukraine situation fail to work out as expected by MSM and specialised media, then presumably a lot of other places shall have first dibs on gear that Republic of China requires, and thus pushing deliveries to end of the next decade, say 2039.

F16s delivered in 2039? when they are already no-good now!

Team USA needs to switch on war-economy, and fast, if to be taken seriously.







defensenews.com

Taiwan is buying US weapons, but Washington isn’t delivering them

WASHINGTON — Nearly a dozen Dongfeng ballistic missiles flew over Taiwan earlier this month as China conducted its largest-ever military exercises in the nearby strait as a response to U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visiting Taipei.
...
The U.S. government has approved the sale of 10 weapons systems Taiwan has yet to receive — some of which are not slated for delivery until the end of the decade.
...



To: maceng2 who wrote (194452)1/12/2023 6:03:49 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 220172
 
The Russian media might have it correct re USA / ROC / PRC

I remain agnostic

2023 has certainly started off 'interesting'

rt.com

What US Republicans could do with their new anti-China committee

Washington’s Beijing policy is bound to become even more aggressive and unpredictable

By Timur Fomenko, political analyst



At the beginning of the year, the Republican Party took control of the US House of Representatives, after their victory in the November midterm elections. Following internal party struggles and gridlock over the election of the new speaker, the House voted to create a new Congressional Select Committee on China, aiming to intensify US competition against Beijing. The Republican Party’s pick to lead the new committee, Representative Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin, has vowed to “ win the new Cold War” against China.

The GOP’s narrow majority in the House of the Representatives, its laser focus on China, contempt for the US presidency and Speaker Kevin McCarthy's dependency on the party’s right wing, spells further trouble for the US-China relationship. While the Biden administration has never been ‘friendly’ with Beijing, and this is probably one of the few areas of bipartisan agreement left in Washington, things are likely to become even more unpredictable as Republican hawks seek to advance their agenda.

There is no doubt that the Republican-held House will seek to deliver a hammer blow to President Joe Biden. In an era of growing political polarization in the US, it has become the norm that when the House of Representatives is controlled by the party that does not control the presidency, they seek to disrupt, undermine, stall, and humiliate the White House. When Trump was president and Nancy Pelosi’s democrats controlled the House, she decided to force a government shutdown by blocking Trump’s funding for his border wall, creating one of the biggest standoffs of its kind in US history.


US rankles China with latest Taiwan ‘provocation’

This means that for Biden, there’s plenty of that kind of stuff ahead. The Republican House will be seeking to block his budget agenda, especially when it comes to healthcare, education, social costs, and of course immigration matters. But in addition to that, they will seek to force new things on the president too, and one area they have in mind is China. Now in practice, Joe Biden’s China policy is actually more aggressive and hawkish than Donald Trump’s was, even if it is more strategically rational. But hawks always want more. They don’t want a stable relationship with Beijing that is predictable, they want a full-on cold war, they want to push the lines on everything.

This means, and especially with the new select committee, the Republican-led House of Representatives will be producing more anti-China bills – and owing to the influence the political right has now gained over the speaker, some may also get traction. These bills will likely consist of new efforts at sanctioning Chinese individuals or entities, declaring more support for Taiwan, both politically and militarily, and similar things. As has always been the case with anti-China bills, they are likely to get comprehensive support from all of Congress, forcing the president to accept them, and therefore having an impact on the relationship with China whether he wills it or not.

But this also means that anti-China bills will become part of the ‘Congressional game’, especially in the inter-partisan struggle between the House and the Senate. For example, the Republicans may seek to block the passage of a bill in line with Biden’s agenda, forcing the Democrats to concede to supporting anti-China bills in exchange. The US Congress after all is a game, one which involves lots of wheeling, dealing, and haggling. One very strong example of this was in 2020 when Republicans negotiated the addition of a Tibet sanctions-related billto the Covid-19 stimulus act, showing the logic of ‘We will not give you X, unless you also agree to Y’.

READ MORE: Why did China remove its ‘wolf warrior’ spokesperson?
Therefore, from Beijing’s point of view, this is bad news. While China is likely to point to the inevitable divisions and political conflict in Washington, DC as an example as to why American democracy is broken and dysfunctional, the problem is that this arrangement creates unpredictability and instability, which subsequently leads to more anti-China politics coming to the forefront. The US president is already super-hawkish, but he is not unpredictable. Thus, the shift in the congressional balance of power means he will lose control over certain aspects of US foreign policymaking, in particular of those who endeavour to make the situation worse. So when it comes to thorny issues such as Taiwan, we can fully expect 2023 to be a bumpy year as Republicans will seek to inflame tensions.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.