Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (26838)	12/18/2022 8:01:37 PM
From: h_	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37816

Propose a possibility then. You can't, because everything points to the jab, and it's completely obvious.

To: gg cox who wrote (26838)	12/18/2022 8:13:26 PM
From: golfer72	2 Recommendations Recommended By h_ longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37816

LOL thats your answer? How about we stop the vaccines and figure out wtf is going on? Ever think of that? Especially since the "vaccines" dont work anyway and arent needed.

To: gg cox who wrote (26838)	12/18/2022 8:37:26 PM
From: russet	2 Recommendations Recommended By gg cox longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37816

Cigarette smoking and lung cancer went on for years because they were doing the stats wrong. Statisticians looked at the general population and tried to prove that smokers had a higher chance of contracting lung cancer than non smokers,....along with all sorts of other cancers and heart disease and strokes. They could not find a statistical difference or correlation between smokers, non smokers and all these ailments. Then several smart statisticians rephrased the question,....Given you have lung cancer, what are the chances you are a smoker? How about 95% for lung cancer. And most of the other 5% were the relatives living at home with the smoker or workers in bars and restaurants that couldn't escape the smoke. Similar numbers for heart disease, strokes and lots of other cancers. That's when the warnings and pictures starting going on the packages. It took decades to make this understanding. The current debates on vaxed vs unvaxed are going to take years to prove one way or the other because the problems are just as subtle and require a lot more data and analysis with respect to age and underlying conditions. In the meantime, N95 masks and social distancing and staying home and away from others when you are sick have been proven unequivocally to prevent infections from virus and bigger germs. Older people with underlying conditions should stay away from others too.