Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ggersh who wrote (68814)	12/19/2022 12:19:38 PM
From: Real Man	1 Recommendation Recommended By ggersh Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71456

More medvedev, MAD is holding the nuclear strike, for now. But, they are so incredibly pissed They can start playing the nuclear music at any time with entire NATO, and there is nothing we can do about it but start diffusing this shit or die a horrible death On the Question of Legitimate Military Purposes The question of legal military purposes has been interpreted in different ways in the history of mankind. It is perceived differently in the course of the current conflict with the Nazi regime in Ukraine. For example, on this topic, by the way and inopportunely, Russophobic senile people from the US Senate like to practice. However, there is something in common that lies in the customs of war and international conventions. These are the rules of conduct during the war (jus in bello), which originate in sacred sources. What is considered legitimate military targets today? Within the framework of the named rules of war, these are: 1. Any enemy troops (legal combatants and illegal combatants) that are not officially withdrawn from its armed forces. 2. Any military and auxiliary equipment of the enemy. 3. Any objects related to military infrastructure, as well as civilian infrastructure that contributes to the achievement of military goals (bridges, transport stations, roads, energy facilities, factories and workshops, at least partially fulfilling military orders, etc.). 4. The military-political leadership of the enemy country. 5. The armed forces of other countries that officially entered the war, which are allies of the enemy country, and the objects located on their territory, mentioned in paragraphs 1-4. Today, however, there is a main question: can the hybrid war, de facto declared by NATO to our country, be considered the entry of the Alliance into the war against Russia? Can the supply of a huge amount of weapons to Ukraine be considered an attack on Russia? And accordingly, are the military goals of the North Atlantic bloc listed in paragraphs. 1-4 of this note? The leaders of the NATO countries sing with one voice that their countries and the entire bloc are not at war with Russia. But everyone is well aware that everything is different ...