Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1386533)	1/9/2023 10:41:40 AM
From: pocotrader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575120

how come that pedo is not in jail? Did he buy off his victims family?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1386533)	7/13/2023 8:53:40 PM
From: Thomas M.	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB tntpal Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575120

He then started holding up images of people like Oprah Winfrey and Hillary Clinton, which he described as “pedophiles,” Oprah’s spiritual healer has been sentenced to 99 years in prison after being found guilty of raping and abusing over 600 women and young girls. João de Deus, or “John of God,” also ran a baby trafficking operation where newborn children were sold to childless couples. nexusnewsfeed.com Tom

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1386533)	7/13/2023 9:09:15 PM
From: Sdgla	Respond to of 1575120

Hunter Biden lawyer sends cease and desist to Trump over Truth Social posts: Report by Jack Birle, Breaking News Reporter July 13, 2023 08:39 PM Latest Byron Donalds says White House cocaine investigation speaks to ‘lax atmosphere’ of Biden administration By: Heather Hamilton Manchin celebrates inclusion of amendment aimed at blocking Biden gas stove ban in appropriations bill By: Eden Villalovas Duckworth says GOP voters defecting over abortion as 2024 candidates woo Iowa conservatives By: Julia Johnson Videos Big Tech worries remain bipartisan, but views on FTC's Lina Khan aren't Crenshaw and AOC expect to pass bill funding psychedelic clinical trials for PTSD China reveals plan to send two rockets to the moon by 2030 McCarthy hasn't endorsed for 2024, but: 'I'm very high on President Trump' Newsletters Sign up now to get the Washington Examiner’s breaking news and timely commentary delivered right to your inbox. A lawyer for Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, reportedly sent a cease and desist letter to former President Donald Trump over his comments about the younger Biden on social media. The letter to Trump, from attorney Abbe Lowell, stressed that the former president's posts were endangering Hunter Biden's safety, per ABC News. NINE TAKEAWAYS FROM FBI DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER WRAY'S TESTIMONY "This is not a false alarm," Lowell said in the letter, per the outlet. "We are just one such social media message away from another incident, and you should make clear to Mr. Trump — if you have not done so already — that Mr. Trump’s words have caused harm in the past and threaten to do so again if he does not stop," he added. In the letter, Lowell also pushed back on claims Trump has made on social media that the cocaine found at the White House last week may have belonged to Hunter Biden. The lawyer noted that the Biden family was at Camp David when the cocaine was discovered on July 2. "You know, if Mr. Trump does not, that Mr. Biden has neither committed nor been accused of the charges that your client is claiming ... and that the Biden family was not at the White House (let alone in the vestibule) in the period when the cocaine was found," Lowell said in the letter, per ABC News. Trump has made several posts on Truth Social about the president's son. On July 5, Trump asked if anyone believed that the cocaine found at the White House "is for the use of anyone other than Hunter & Joe Biden." On July 10, Trump claimed the Secret Service knew "100%" who the cocaine belonged to and that it "was for use by Hunter, & probably Crooked Joe." CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER The Secret Service announced Thursday it had concluded its investigation into the July 2 discovery of cocaine in the West Wing of the executive mansion. The investigation did not name any suspects due to a "lack of physical evidence."

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1386533)	7/13/2023 9:11:10 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575120

A landmark censorship case that is turning the unconstitutional actions of our government on its head. The case is Missouri v. Biden. I have been reporting on this case since the day it was filed. For those of you who may be just hearing about it, this is it in a nutshell: The states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with several private Plaintiffs, are suing the United States government, alleging that they pressured social media companies to implement censorship of Americans on their platforms. The complaint requested expedited discovery and deposition in order to obtain a temporary injunction. This was granted. In the months since, there have been a number of twists and turns, but depositions were taken, and I attended the oral arguments for the temporary injunction in Federal court in Louisiana. On July 4th, after over a month of waiting, the judge finally ruled and GRANTED this injunction, which bars social media companies from engaging in meetings, discussions, etc., where the purpose is to flag content or collaborate on censorship. We will go over this in detail in a moment. The order is groundbreaking, but this case is groundbreaking. It is one of the most important civil liberties cases of our lifetimes. I implore you to look at my pinned tweet, as the thread is highly detailed and covers everything thus far. Before we continue, a round of applause for one of the only judges left with the cajoles to do the right thing. He should be commended. After largely ignoring this case, legacy media is now forced to report on it. Of course, they are reporting dishonestly; it’s what they do. We are about to go through the entire filing, all 155 pages of it, so that you can see what is ACTUALLY discussed instead of the nonsense that is being fed. This order was painstakingly written. It has now been appealed, but there is no stay in place, meaning this order will be in effect until the appeal is heard or until the motion for a stay is granted. I am of the firm belief that no appellate court judge will be able to read this and overturn the injunction. You will see why in a moment. Here is the link to the 155-page document we will be dissecting now. It is laid out into sections and details what each agency has done in blatant disregard for the Constitution. The information contained within is all based on discovery obtained in order to argue for this injunction in the first place. In his introduction, the judge points out that the censorship almost EXCLUSIVELY targeted conservative speech. This was a point he asked about in the hearing. The government’s reply was that 99% of all “misinformation” just happens to come from the right….. Marinate on that for a moment…