SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1387086)1/13/2023 1:34:53 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 1583791
 
"I just don't agree with the notion that the planet will "heal itself" by using nature as an immune system against the "virus" of humanity. That's straight out of the movie Avatar"

In that case, Avatar is straight out of the brain of Lovelock.

Gaia hypothesis - Wikipedia

The Gaia hypothesis ( /'ga?.?/), also known as the Gaia theory, Gaia paradigm, or the Gaia principle, proposes that living organisms interact with their inorganic surroundings on Earth to form a synergistic and self-regulating, complex system that helps to maintain and perpetuate the conditions for life on the planet.

The Gaia hypothesis was formulated by the chemist James Lovelock [1] and co-developed by the microbiologist Lynn Margulis in the 1970s. [2] Lovelock named the idea after Gaia, the primordial goddess who personified the Earth in Greek mythology. The suggestion that the theory should be called "the Gaia hypothesis" came from Lovelock's neighbour, William Golding. In 2006, the Geological Society of London awarded Lovelock the Wollaston Medal in part for his work on the Gaia hypothesis. [3]

Topics related to the hypothesis include how the biosphere and the evolution of organisms affect the stability of global temperature, salinity of seawater, atmospheric oxygen levels, the maintenance of a hydrosphere of liquid water and other environmental variables that affect the habitability of Earth.

The Gaia hypothesis was initially criticized for being teleological and against the principles of natural selection, but later refinements aligned the Gaia hypothesis with ideas from fields such as Earth system science, biogeochemistry and systems ecology. [4] [5] [6] Even so, the Gaia hypothesis continues to attract criticism, and today many scientists consider it to be only weakly supported by, or at odds with, the available evidence. [7] [8] [9]

==

"In any case, like I (and others) have said before, the planet's ecosystem is resilient."

From time to time, Rat says that the planet will be just fine. About the only things it has to worry about is getting hit by something the size of Venus, or the sun going super-nova. A lot of the species living on it will be wiped out, however.