Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pierre who wrote (8470)	2/12/1998 3:19:00 PM
From: brian h	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Pierre, Boy! Just because you guys are QCOM longs (Ramsey is a shaky long. Is he included also?) does not mean you guys have to become cyber friends that fast. Hey! Hey! Hey! Making friends down in SD is not as important as making QCOM price up fast!!!! (ggg) You guys really left us (QCOM long but short on QCOM meeting) jealous. I, for one, have to wait until QCOM price to go $80 before I can afford to join you guys. (ggg) Anyway, Have fun you guys. May be next year. Brian H.

To: Pierre who wrote (8470)	2/12/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: JMD	Respond to of 152472

Pierre, man does it take a lot to drag all the good stuff out of you guys. I have to resort to slinging Motley mud posts to get your attention. Comforting to hear that not all of you were passed out in the back row, and caught just a few words about Europe/Vodaphone/and new standard Q IPR applicability. Was beginning to think that these were inconsequential. Obviously, we need to figure out what % of Q profits are tied up in Korea: that is a scary thought. Clearly a hunk, but can't be all--can it? Thanks for post. Mike Doyle