SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (195427)1/15/2023 10:49:53 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Julius Wong

  Respond to of 219932
 
Top global companies write down billions as deals make way for gloom

Business leaders prepare to meet in Davos as a third of the world economy is forecast to be in recession this year

Davos Congress Centre will host the World Economic Forum summit to the backdrop of what has been called a ‘polycrisis’'
© Arnd Wiegmann/Reuters Top global companies write down billions as deals make way for gloom

Stephen Foley in New York 7 HOURS AGO

. Some of the world’s biggest companies are facing multibillion-dollar writedowns on recent acquisitions as a wave of dealmaking gives way to a new era of economic uncertainty and higher interest rates. With a third of the global economy forecast to be in recession this year, world leaders will this week gather in Davos, Switzerland, to discuss what the World Economic Forum has called a “polycrisis” as business leaders engage in a painful reckoning over their empire building.

US media and healthcare companies are among those to have slashed the value of business units in the past few months and accountants are warning that more cuts could be imminent as the annual reporting season gets under way. Companies are required to assess the carrying value of intangible assets at least once a year, using assumptions about future cash flows and comparisons to stock market valuations, which fell sharply in 2022. With higher costs owing to inflation and a weaker outlook for demand, many recently acquired businesses may struggle to justify their valuations, even before factoring in higher interest rates, which further reduce the present value of future cash flows.

“It’s a pretty deadly combination,” said Jasmeet Singh Marwah, managing director at Stout, a valuation services company. “For many businesses?.?.?.?they made the acquisition and the performance has not been at par with what they expected or budgeted for.” Global dealmaking hit a record $5.7tn in 2021, but slowed sharply as 2022 progressed. According to Refinitiv, $1.4tn of transactions were agreed in the second half of last year compared with $2.2tn in the first, marking the biggest swing from one six-month period to the next since records began in 1980.

The premium paid for an acquisition over the value of its net assets is called goodwill and is recorded on the acquirer’s balance sheet. Goodwill writedowns grew in size in the US last year, to the point where they were occasionally big enough to wipe out a company’s profits in the quarter in which they were recorded. The 10 largest goodwill writedowns at S&P 500 companies in 2022 totalled $35.4bn, according to data gathered by consultancy Kroll, compared with $6.1bn in 2021. Launching a bid to join the Disney board this week, investor Nelson Peltz highlighted the around $50bn in goodwill on Disney’s balance sheet attributable to the acquisition of Fox, which he predicted would have to be largely written down.

Business and political leaders in Davos for the WEF’s first winter meeting since before the coronavirus pandemic confront a vastly different landscape to three years ago. Ahead of the meeting, the WEF’s annual risk report warned of a “polycrisis” as the soaring cost of living and an economic downturn combine with continued failures to tackle inequality and climate change. Kristalina Georgieva, the IMF’s managing director, who will be in Davos to present the fund’s latest economic outlook, predicted earlier this month that one-third of the world economy will be in recession this year, including half the EU. The size of goodwill writedowns in Europe has not so far risen. The 10 largest in the Stoxx 600 totalled €6.4bn last year, according to Kroll, down from €17bn in 2021. European companies have later financial year-ends and less frequent reporting, said Carla Nunes, a Kroll managing director, suggesting that more goodwill impairments could come in the spring. Dan Langlois, partner at KPMG, said recent acquisitions could be vulnerable to writedowns even if they are currently performing to plan. “When you factor in cost inflation that maybe wasn’t anticipated, when you factor in higher interest rates, which drive up the rate you might use in a discounted cash flow analysis, and then factor in some of the uncertainties associated with a potential recession, those things in totality will influence fair value,” he said. In October, Comcast reported a more-than-$8bn writedown of the broadcaster Sky, which it acquired in 2018, citing challenging economic conditions in the UK and other European markets and plunging the media group into a $4.6bn quarterly loss. Earlier last year, Teladoc Health, which acquired virtual care provider Livongo for $13.9bn in 2020, recorded two consecutive quarters of writedowns totalling close to $10bn. While companies are required to subtract goodwill writedowns from their profit, many exclude them from the “adjusted” numbers they highlight in earnings reports. Recommended Mergers & Acquisitions Sharp fall in global dealmaking brings pandemic-era frenzy to a halt That does not mean investors should ignore them, said David Zion, founder of Zion Research. When a company cuts the value of its assets, its debt to equity ratio goes up, which in turn increases the risk of breaching covenants on its debt, he said. It can also flatter future returns. “Management will tell you it’s non-cash, it’s one-time, don’t worry about it. Don’t forget that, when return on assets is so good two years down the line, that is because they took a giant impairment.” Kroll’s Nunes added that goodwill impairments provide a readout on the quality of a company’s dealmaking. “You can tell if you are getting a return on your investment,” she said, “or if the buyer may be overpaying for these businesses.” Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023. All rights reserved. Reuse this content(opens in new window)CommentsJump to comments section



To: TobagoJack who wrote (195427)1/16/2023 2:45:14 AM
From: maceng22 Recommendations

Recommended By
Cogito Ergo Sum
Pogeu Mahone

  Respond to of 219932
 
Most interesting. "The West" had all the marbles to make successful economies post WW2 but only allowed the defeated nations to utilize them. We also had people like Joseph Dodge who could use oversight as a benefit. There were some good leaders at that time, as well as the more usual collection of people who didn't know what they were doing.

It's Deming btw not "Denning" :-)

W. Edwards Deming - Wikipedia

but we know who the author is talking about, clear enough.

<<If there was one taxation policy which would reduce consumer price inflation, stabilise a fiat currency, encourage capital allocation for productive purposes, and improve government finances for the longer-term, what would it be?

Remove all taxes from savings.

This is the lesson from past-war West Germany and Japan, both of which suffered absolute defeat and economic destruction in the Second World War. Their currencies were worthless. But they recovered to become economic powerhouses in Europe and Asia respectively in little more than two decades. Both implemented savings-friendly taxation policies, which made capital available at stable interest rates for new industries to invest in production. Germany developed its Mittelstand, and Japan built on her vertically integrated Zaibatsu.

Germany was fortunate in its Economy Minister, Ludwig Erhard. A free marketeer who on 20 June 1948 took the bull by the horns, Erhard unilaterally ended rationing on the same day as the new mark was introduced, presenting it as a fait accompli to the military governors in the British and American zones. In a week, shops had begun to reopen, and goods became widely available.

In negotiations with the military governors, Erhard managed to obtain income tax concessions for savings, which through the banking system were invested making capital available for private sector reconstruction. While he struggled against both military governments in the two zones to retain lower taxes and for favourable treatment for savings into the 1950s, Erhard had laid the foundations for a savings driven, free market economy. By the 1980s, the only tax on savings was a 10% withholding tax on bank interest and bond coupons, which was not generally pursued by the German tax authorities in the knowledge that attempts to do so would simply drive savings beyond their reach into Luxembourg and Zurich.

For this reason, Germany remained a savings driven economy with a strong currency right up to the mark’s incorporation in the new euro. Much to the confusion of British and American neo-Keynesians subscribing to their cherished savings paradox, Germany became the wealthiest of the European nations, other than perhaps Switzerland. In both cases, hard currencies accompanied wealth creation.

Erhard’s post-war opposition was principally from General Sir Brian Robertson, the head of the British occupation government, and from the French. The commander of the American occupation zone, General Lucius Clay was more sympathetic with free market solutions. The Americans had promoted A Plan for the Liquidation of War Finance and Financial Rehabilitation of Germany (1946), written at Clay’s behest, one of the co-authors being Joseph Dodge. In 1949, Dodge was then appointed to advise the Japanese government on its post-war reconstruction as an aide to General MacArthur. And Dodge was instrumental in ensuring that up to a certain level, post office savings accounts were entirely tax free. It was probably a deliberate oversight on his part, but the tax law didn’t stop an account holder merely opening another savings account when the tax-free limit on an existing account was reached.

Dodge implemented what became known as “The Dodge Line”. By insisting on a balanced national budget and shutting down the printing presses, he ended hyperinflation. The exchange rate between the yen and the dollar stabilised. Government economic intervention and interference was slashed across the board. Echoing John Cowperthwaite’s free market policies in Hong Kong, Dodge realised that the best economic progress was obtained by eliminating state interference, leaving it to Japan’s businessmen and entrepreneurs who, despite the war, retained the skills and connections to run their businesses. With MacArthur’s support, he ruthlessly eliminated subsidies and price controls. Dodge was eventually recalled to America, becoming Truman’s Director of the Budget where in the space of only a year he had cut the US federal deficit in half.

Dodge’s free market approach was supplemented by the assistance of another American adviser, W Edwards Denning. Denning introduced quality control techniques to Japanese manufacturing which revolutionised production. As a consequence of Denning’s contribution, Japan rapidly evolved from a source of shoddy goods into a producer of the best consumer technology and the manufacture of world-beating high quality consumer goods.

Behind this revolution was the tax incentive to save – a simple approach of assuming that taxed earnings put aside should not be taxed again. In both Germany and Japan, these were not the only factors that led to a successful emergence from total desolation, but they are the elements that ensured that both nations continued to flourish. And in Japan, despite the government fully embracing Keynesian philosophy in the wake of the late-eighties speculative bubble, the savings culture of “Mrs Watanabe, the Japanese housewife” persists to this day.

After his stint in Japan and while Joe Dodge worked his budget magic for Truman, the British were going in the opposite direction, eschewing free markets, embracing Keynesianism, persisting with rationing until 1954, and imposing punitive taxes on savings. The decline of post-war Britain and much of Europe need not enter our narrative, but it was a feature of all nations which implemented economic policies of taxing savings.>>