SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Jackson who wrote (8450)2/12/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: earlyj  Respond to of 213177
 
more history of the Microcomputer revolution...

"Raw Bytes Computer News" Frank Delaney

physplt.wsu.edu



enjoy.....earlyj



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (8450)2/12/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Scott Crumley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 213177
 
Bill,

Are you thinking about the Xerox Star? It succeeded the Alto in the Xerox PC line.

And regarding your comment of Dave Every's article:

"Some of his comments are a bit revisionist, as they differ from my memory, He is right about Jobs(told you so)."

It seems we finally agree on something. The following is a direct quote from Dave Every's article:

"Founders personalities effect corporations. It happened with IBM and Apple and MS. Apples biggest problems started because they lost Steve Jobs and sort of lost their guidance. But Steve Jobs was an egomaniacal charismatic young kid who was not making the best business decisions at the time of his leaving ('86). He needed to mature and grow - which he has done a lot. Having him back at Apple gives apple back a piece of their soul - and may give them a visionary which they need. Jobs has more money than he wants or needs - and his motivation does not appear to be wealth or power - he wants to dent the universe, to make a difference to make products that are insanely great - and his company picks up that spirit and tries to do the same. Sometimes they succeed, and sometimes they fail - but they try."

Scott



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (8450)2/12/1998 6:58:00 PM
From: X-Ray Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
Sorry, Bill, I still don't see anywhere in your discussion
that subtantiates that MSFT obtained GUI intellectual property
directly from XeroxPARC. I have never heard this any place
else before, even from another MSFT advocate.