Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1389392)	1/31/2023 5:15:11 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572057

Broken Cuck, Feel free to dispute Hedges with facts you can link to. He doesn't provide any facts other than "M1 logistics is hard," which absolutely no one is disputing. He bases his conclusions on how poorly trained Iraq and Afghani forces have been, but that's apples and oranges. Iraq had to fight asymmetrical wars against insurgents, first from within, then vs. ISIS. As for Afghanistan, no one had the will to fight for the US-installed regime there, which is why the Taliban walked right into Kabul without firing more than a few shots. Everything else your latest "expert" says comes from a Scott Ritter-like perspective. When he uses phrases like "NATO is panicking" without backing it up with evidence, it shows that he, like the pedophile Ritter, is stating his wishes rather than any evidence-backed conclusions. The truth is that NATO is still pussyfooting around. That's not out of panic or paranoia, or else NATO would have provided TONS more resources than just a paltry sum of 200 tanks. Now I'll wait while you continue taking the lazy way out and appealing to authority ... Tenchusatsu