Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1390240)	2/6/2023 7:54:40 PM
From: Wharf Rat	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Respond to of 1571813

"Once upon a time scientists would work on a theory " Here's one... rsc.org

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1390240)	2/6/2023 7:56:42 PM
From: golfer72	1 Recommendation Recommended By Winfastorlose Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571813

TenQ is finding out now how poor reviews and scrutiny of Pfizers fraudulent vaccine trials are affecting he world. And they wanted to hide them for 75 years LOL!!! Jeez i wonder why! Stand by for the word salad with extra Q dressing!!

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1390240)	2/7/2023 12:28:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571813

Joachim, I get it, the whole peer review process is rife with politicization and conflicts of interest. Yet the question still remains. If you get rid of the entire process altogether, what will replace it? Because if you think the existing peer review process is flawed, wait until you have a bunch of self-proclaimed Internet "experts" (like me) reviewing research. That would absolutely paralyze science. Tenchusatsu