SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1390295)2/7/2023 1:02:46 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1571821
 
Joachim,
Comparing scientists who do a study of a group of people taking a drug is different than scientists studying planetary motion.
And yet the corruption of the peer review process is being used to reject any research that Big Pharma produces.

NOW you want to run away from that by claiming "But, but, it's DIFFERENT!"
Do we have a commercially vested interest? That ain't science...
Why not? The profit motive is perhaps one of the BEST motivators for getting the R&D right. Faking the science only proves profitable when the results don't matter, but the quantity of research does.
I'm putting you on ignore for a bit so I don't get sucked into this ridiculous conversation again...
This is exactly how the Q Continuum reacts when losing an argument. Just put the guy they're arguing against on Ignore.

Tenchusatsu



To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1390295)2/7/2023 1:03:27 PM
From: golfer72  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571821
 
Well said. TenQ is an apologist and gaslighter for Big Pharma. We know why. It always Q this and Q that. Almost as pathetic as Landturd