Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Street Walker who wrote (204)	2/13/1998 3:16:00 AM
From: Dirk Hente	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14778

[appain vs colorgraphic] thats really a tough question. i wouldnt decide only on the RDRAM/SGRAM feature ( both technologies seems to be very fast) my key criteria are 1. refresh rate for a given resolution it is obvious that you can drive the colorgraphic card at a higher refresh rate for a given resolution. whether this is an issue depends on the resolution you are using on each monitor. i guess if you are running a 1024x768 its not that important. 2. the software driver for the card finally i found the description of the utility available by colorgraphic, they call it 'Mover': colorgfx.com the best is to download the utility and read the help. this is what i've found out: 'mover' allows placement control of 're-sizable application windows'. placement can be based on cursor position or by a monitor prompt (sounds good). 'mover' prevents dialog window splitting (if enabled) 'mover' maximizes applications to a single screen to check for physical monitor configuration (is it possible to arrange 4 monitors in a row?, the pics at the colorgraphic site show only a cube configuration)you have to look into the driver software at ftp.colorgfx.com/colorgfx unfortunately this site is unaccessible while i am writing this. so far everything counts for colorgraphic evolution.