Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (10314)	2/8/2023 9:00:08 AM
From: nicewatch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13775

Take this, or take him offline? ;-) You'll have to forgive me for not seeing this earlier, it's not like I check the site daily although maybe I should now? hindenburgresearch.com Don't have a track record handy but it's not like all of Hindenburg's reports are giant slayers and 100% reliable over time but occasionally they are and they've caught some big ones over the years and this potentially would be by far the largest. Similar to MuddyWaters if you've ever heard of them: muddywatersresearch.com MW had a brilliant report last decade and believe he had spent time in China as an analyst and investor. Anyway he exposed a Canadian (or Canuckistan as I like to call it) listed stock of a purported Chinese Timber company. Turns out they had forests to nowhere. Totally made up. en.wikipedia.org Some short report outfits are more hit and runs, and the two named above aren't always correct long term. But if they write a negative report on something you own then you owe it to yourself and your portfolio balance to seriously consider what they're saying, even considering that they've vested interests. fwiw.