SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (777848)2/14/2023 9:38:06 AM
From: D. Long1 Recommendation

Recommended By
John Carragher

  Respond to of 793916
 
From what I've read, it seems like the train would block the line for a long time so they thought they could do a controlled burn and get the cars off the line quicker. Welp, that was incorrect to say the least.



To: John Carragher who wrote (777848)2/14/2023 9:55:41 AM
From: sm1th3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Maple MAGA
rdkflorida2
Shoot1st

  Respond to of 793916
 
doesn't make sense , controlled explosion. vs putting out the fire around the cars.


Many years ago, I did design work on a barge to carry vinyl chloride. It is nasty stuff, explosive over a wide range of air/gas ratios. An explosion would have been much worse. Once the cars leaked there were no good options.



To: John Carragher who wrote (777848)2/14/2023 10:38:24 AM
From: alanrs1 Recommendation

Recommended By
John Carragher

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793916
 
I'm very curious about what hazmat procedures where in place prior to the accident and who authorized burning.
Glad I don't live down wind of there.