My take:
Soros learned from experience in his youth that its better to survive and be a NAZI collaborator, helping NAZI's to exterminate Jews, and making some nice money from it, than it is to be one of the Jews being exterminated by NAZI's with Sorors' help.
Not that he's the only victim of war who has ever had his humanity forcibly detached from him by trauma... when being forced into making ugly choices while putting one's self interest in survival ahead of others interest. I don't know that he's at all unique in having made the choices he did... only as most people are never really subjected to the need to make those sorts of choices... and most people have never really thought about it deeply before having it happen to them... and thus are wholly unprepared. So, not a hero, but a sad anti-hero and victim... left to try to rationalize his misdeeds... might apply up until the end of the war. But, the resulting PTSD... or his dysfunctional or dissociative accommodation to it... the nature of the "lessons learned" never left him... and he instead embraced it... willingly adopted it as a functional enough defense mechanism... and he never really succeeded in regaining a "normal" moral attachment to humanity.
He's "mostly" a NAZI, still, at heart... and politically... gladly focusing on advancing his interest as "privately owned capital employed under state control"... while retaining every element in "social lessons" absorbed back then... meaning... "sociopathic and amoral" in his choices... while, today, he's posing as a moralist leftist, to co-opt the political support of that cadre... spends a lot of money "advancing those causes" in ways that have them align with his agenda... where the cadres are glad enough to be co-opted into doing the bidding of his money to advance "their common interest"... in ways that benefit Soros.
How much did he make off the "trade" arranged prior to the Hindenburg Research hatchet job on Adani ?
Soros doesn't really spend his own money on things in the way the public facade suggests... rather, through the work of his ($/intel) team, and through the linked cooperation of his various political minions, he arranges to make them "self funding"... to accomplish his goals at the expense of his victims.
Welcome to the game, Adani... ?
In his dotage, Soros has clearldy "graduated" from a formerly more pure attachment to national socialism... to a more complete attachment to naked capitalism... which requires only his becoming wealthier and realizing that having enough money means you don't actually have to submit to any limits on your capital being imposed "under state control"... but can instead use the control money enables, over those people willing to do its bidding, to impose controls on the state. Which, when done successfully, remains essentially indistinguishable from "privately owned capital employed under state control"... as long as you ignore... or others are denied awareness of... the resulting illegitimacy in "who controls the state".
That's full circle, in my prior explication of "no difference" between the "competing" brands of socialism and naked capitalism... where, ultimately, money and power are all that's of concern to "those in charge"... by whatever means, and by whatever ruses in ideology are required to empower them. The rest... is far enough removed from the struggle to attain and sustain "control" to not really matter. That's the core of "globalism"... and why Soros is one of its primary advocates.
I've previously discussed that as an array defined between its limits, as "no difference between communists and kings, other than who gets to be king"... which, as you might recognize in the context here... fully contains almost every element of that... every brand of socialism... (naked) capitalism... and all of the "opposite land" routinely imposed in misdirecting people to distract them from what matters.
Globalism returns the world to feudalism... obviates the relevance of all the ideological labels to which people may choose to be attached... and returns us to the same structures in politics that have always been employed by the kings of the world to sustain and expand their control while working to undermine their opponents... at home and abroad. "Dissolving borders" as required... or "swapping ownership" of fiefdoms... by whatever means necessary... all fully consistent, etc.
In the logic of ideology being used only as a tool to enable control, with "no difference between them"... "for the greater good" thus always becomes... only a question of who it is you will submit to... or, with "for" a question of who "greater" refers to in first, second, or third person... the purpose of its use being a pan-ideological co-opting of society and its morality... to employ it against those who are deluded by it (as opposed to those controlled by having been put on the payroll) into doing what I, you, or "they" want others to do...
So, in context, people like the Clinton's... can be seen as "useful idiot's" who are "engaged in team sports" and easily controlled by their greed... as clearly apparent in all the dirty money grubbing you see them engaged in... both during and after their political tenure. It also fully explains Hillary thinking she was "owed" the job... since she'd both "paid her dues" to win it... and had "paid", literally, to have it.
And, Biden's flagrant life long lack of integrity and obvious serial corruption... clearly disqualifying him from any position of trust... somehow gets overlooked... or, in fact, becomes a job qualification rather than a disqualifier ? That all clearly tells you whose rule set it is that we're really subject to...
The "team sports" element of "no difference between" Republicans and Democrats... with the contest between them posed as a distraction from what is actually dictating policy... when policy is clearly not ever changed in any meaningful result of our votes, or of who we choose to elect as an expression of what we want ?
That's ONE instance of the local expression of that condition we're discussing... which naturally will have multiple variants in expression in different locations... the "same thing" also "with Chinese characteristics" necessarily existing in China... in some measure... although I'm constrained in my analysis of the meaning of that... by my limited experience and perspective... and given only a single vantage point from which to observe it... I don't know much about "team sports" in China, or how "all of the above" connects to what I'm describing singularly from a westerners perspective...
So, seeing the instance occurring in India... another in which I'm hardly in position to claim any unique capability in observation... should prove interesting, as we see what results from OTHERS gaining some of the same awareness...
But, a curious element to the instance in India...
In the recent (computer and communications enabled) manipulation of the outcome of the U.S. elections... undertaken to impose his choice... Soros took significant measures to try to mask his involvement... removing, ahead of time, any linearly direct linkages in his ownership of the "means" employed... which, however, failed to actually mask his connection to participation in every element.
In the instance in India, instead... he directly telegraphed his intent... simply announcing it ahead of time ?
What does that mean ? |
