Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (196438)	2/17/2023 11:00:17 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone	1 Recommendation Recommended By maceng2 Respond to of 217670

tv news showed these poor people sucking on albuterol inhalers every 30 seconds. They were very young. truly avoidable situation Fukushima looks like a health spa compared to this.

To: maceng2 who wrote (196438)	2/19/2023 4:24:35 AM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Recommended By maceng2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217670

"These were the systems there supposed to protect the public"... Poking at the logic applied in "making obvious mistakes" this week has been interesting... "Reason" has an unfortunately not that short list of examples, which they have packed into 10 brief episodes of "Great Moments in Unintended Consequences"... again, showing that while not all systems appear equally capable of the same extremes in error... no one seems immune from the potential to make really bad decisions... the "tendency" appears universal... Volume 2 is interesting in showing that, when you don't know what you're doing, even what appear to be very "small" decisions... can have not small consequences in extreme disproportion... But, is it helpful... pointing it out... ? Why are some systems more capable than others of making "really big" errors... and not correcting them ?