Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1391636)	2/17/2023 4:24:31 PM
From: golfer72	1 Recommendation Recommended By maceng2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570843

Just follow the money. Thats Climate $cience LOL!!! Govt grants and guess what? They find whatever the Govt wants! Duh! LOL!

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1391636)	2/17/2023 5:21:34 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570843

There seems to be some important time stamps missing off that chart. I can't see "Climategate" (Nov 2009) on the timeline. Another case of data completely ignored or fiddled with. Amongst a large number of other important bits. This guy changed his mind... as I did. As said, the "The Political Method" of science is clearly on display with all your posts on Climate. The rules for applying the unscientific method to a problem are simple: ~ Know what answer you are looking for. ~ Look for evidence and arguments to support your answer. ~ Avoid or ignore evidence and arguments that do not support your answer. ~ Deride those who disagree with you. It’s that simple. And it is much easier to use than any real scientific method. Maybe that’s why so many people use it. 18. The UNscientific method. Part 1. \| Dr Len Fisher (lenfisherscience.com)