Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1391644)

2/17/2023 3:46:42 PM

From: Wharf Rat

1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

Respond to of 1571408

DirecTV Fires Back at Newsmax in Letter to GOP Senators, Says It Dropped Network as Part of ‘Typical Business Dispute’

Story by Michael Luciano • Yesterday 2:40?PM

DirecTV responded to a letter from Republican Sens. Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz, Sen. Lindsey Graham, and Mike Lee inquiring about its decision to drop Newsmax from its channel lineup.

The AT&T subsidiary removed Newsmax after the network demanded it be paid higher carriage fees. DirecTV replaced the network with another conservative channel, The First, which features shows hosted by right-wing pundits such as Bill O’Reilly and Dana Loesch.

That hasn’t stopped Newsmax and its allies in Congress from crying censorship.

“It has been alleged that DirecTV pays substantial sums to numerous channels that are politically left-of-center, even when those channels have substantially lower ratings than Newsmax,” the letter stated, seeking answers from the carrier.

In response, DirecTV general counsel Michael Hartman sent a letter on Wednesday, telling the senators the move was purely a business decision.

“With respect to the Newsmax situation, put simply, this is a typical business dispute that has nothing to do with ideology, politics or censorship – despite unfounded accusations to the contrary by Newsmax, its CEO, its commentators and others,” Hartman wrote.

As The Daily Beast noted, Newsmax asked DirecTV for $1 per subscriber annually, which would have amounted to about $13 million a year.

Hartman stated that Newsmax makes itself available for free on other carriers and streaming services.

“Unfortunately, in pursuit of a purely commercial goal that it has not been able to obtain through negotiations, Newsmax is using its news/editorial platform to publish inaccurate and misleading information regarding our contract dispute,” he wrote.

In recent weeks, Newsmax hosts have bombarded viewers with requests, asking them to contact DirecTV and even appeal to their members of Congress. Lawmakers who give the network interviews are also frequently asked to weigh in.

On Wednesday, for example, Cruz called on DirecTV to reverse its decision and reinstate Newsmax, calling the station “fair and balanced.”

The post DirecTV Fires Back at Newsmax in Letter to GOP Senators, Says It Dropped Network as Part of ‘Typical Business Dispute’ first appeared on Mediaite.

msn.com

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1391644)	2/17/2023 4:45:36 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571408

Wrong. That was the NATO puppet Zelensky refusing to accept peace with Russia and deciding instead to see Ukraine destroyed.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1391644)	2/17/2023 4:52:56 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1571408

The MIC just couldn't stand peace. Zelensky the useful idiot, is paid well for destroying Ukraine. +++ No Military Winner Likely In Ukraine Conflict, Will End In Future Negotiations: Gen. Milley by Tyler Durden Friday, Feb 17, 2023 - 11:40 AM Coming off of meetings in Brussels this week with NATO military partners, Joint Chiefs chairman Mark Milley was interviewed by the Financial Times, discussing his vision for the potential end-game in Ukraine, as well as recent reports of weapons and ammo stockpiles in the West being fast depleted while arming Kiev. In his view, neither side is likely to prevail, in what will be a protracted conflict eventually ending in negotiations. "It will be almost impossible for the Russians to achieve their political objectives by military means," Milley asserted. "It is unlikely that Russia is going to overrun Ukraine. It’s just not going to happen." But he also conceded that it will be "very, very difficult for Ukraine this year to kick the Russians out of every inch" of territory now captured and controlled by Kremlin forces. "It’s not to say that it can’t happen...?But it’s extraordinarily difficult. And it would require essentially the collapse of the Russian military," the top general explained. Interestingly, following widespread reports that US and especially UK officials had stymied early efforts to reach a negotiated settlement, Milley still said there are "opportunities" for diplomacy at any moment. When FT asked him whether talks between Moscow and Kiev are at all possible, Milley responded: "We’re weeks away from the beginning of spring, but it’s a rolling window. There’s opportunities at any moment in time." But he still acknowledged both sides are dug into their positions now more than ever, making near-term serious dialogue unlikely. On the question of Ukraine expending ammo at a rate "many times higher" than that of its better-armed adversary, Milley described that-- "One of the lessons of this war is the very high consumption rates of conventional munitions, and we are re-examining our own stockages and our own plans* to make sure that we got it right."* "We’re trying to do the analysis so that we can then estimate what we think the true requirement would be, and then we have to put that in the budget. Ammunition is very expensive," he conceded. Wow, that's the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff admitting Ukraine won't win. Kind of begs the question why they torpedoed the negotiations early last year, as per the Naftali Bennett revelations. We might arrive at roughly the same result with countless deaths on top. t.co — Arnaud Bertrand (@RnaudBertrand) February 16, 2023Milley said somewhat contradictory things this week. At one point from Brussels he said that Russia has "lost tactically, operationally, and strategically" - but has now also admitted the conflict is headed toward a stalemate and that Ukraine will not ultimately defeat the Russian army. Yet at the same time the Western allies have long claimed Putin won't stop at Ukraine, but will seek to expand into the Baltic states, Moldova and Poland. So Russia both "can't win" and we are told is waging an "expansionist" war... how can both be true? Another central contradiction is that America's top general just said that the war will inevitably end in negotiations, yet Kiev's consistent stance has been to firmly rule out any negotiations so long as Putin is still in power. While Zelenski rules out negotiations with Putin, General Miley says conflict will end negotiation table. pic.twitter.com/ME37MdyURp — pedro silva (@peter45b) February 17, 2023Perhaps this is why Milley in follow-up sought to clarify his statements, stressing the official Biden administration line that it is "up to Ukraine to decide how or when or if they will negotiate with the Russians."