Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (196537)	2/21/2023 8:38:14 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220181

curation A sidebar conversation rt.com However, Borrell said that Wang asked him: “Why do you show concern for me maybe providing arms for Russia when you are providing arms for Ukraine?” Borrell said that he responded by explaining the “big difference” between these scenarios, pointing out “what is at stake for us Europeans in the war in Ukraine.” However, he did not share his explanation with the press. ... am certain, 100%, that Wang info-ed Blinken and Borrell that Ukraine is very much linked to Republic of China, Taiwan province, and one wrong move, WWIII is set to go, and big. The takeaway re the meetings in Munich has been, at the kernel of core, very clear to spectators on Taiwan island, that rug-pull ahead, by implications of reads of popular press, essentially that China is the only large outfit calling for peaceful resolution via negotiations over the Ukraine issue-set, standing forth at this particular juncture because sees chance of nuclear fight unless trajectory stopped. Nuclear war is presumably bad for business and trade. However, as nuclear war threat shall sort out the true believers, expect rug-pulls and multiple levels.