SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: go4it who wrote (5065)2/12/1998 10:41:00 PM
From: JACK R. SMITH JR.  Respond to of 14226
 
Charles,

The answer lies in the statement " Do not tread upon me"! Many on the internet feel that they advance their position by treading upon others. I try not to do that, but attempt to defend my position as I understand it. On the lesser threads you see name calling and all sorts of insult. On the better threads you see a real interchange of useful information. When I visit a thread and I hear "Midget" calling "turk" a S.O.B, I just exit without hesitation. The problem with lots of threads is that there is no useful information, just hype and hope. I mean to offend no one here, but that is just the way that I see it. Does that happen here, sure, but having the history that I have and being a basic sceptic, I can screen that out. I have been the most positive person that I know of on this company (GPGI), but I am also its critic in lots of respects. I love the company for its potential, but I hate it for the crap that I have had to listen to. I can cut through the crap better than most. I have told all how I feel and will continue to do that. They are the absolute worst at public relations. Hopefully, that will improve, but they have a long, long way to go. Of course, substantial profit would override that shortcoming post haste.

Well, I am becoming verbose on a favorite subject and beg the pardon of all!!

Pardon me, Jack!!



To: go4it who wrote (5065)2/12/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh  Respond to of 14226
 
<<<Why do the share holders of all these companies act like the other is a mortal enemy when they are in reality so depended on each other? ..>>> I would like to expand ( different but similar to Jacks'). I think it is the human decision making process, maybe someone like SW can chime in. It is that protection of ones' own self interest. So to speak. A fear of not ..protecting ones' own. An animal type of behavior, basic carnal needs. Hunting and blood. Go get your deer in the Fall and protect your stock in the company you favor. Something like that; though, not all that.
It is much more fun writing over here rather than reading and thinking IPM ..tonight. A moment of silence please. Maybe a new group commonality, common purpose...just maybe a trade association. Yeah, that's it!!! Why don't you start the discussion here! Or maybe at IPM where we both started.
ChucaMiner/Nota/Forty/Niner---a 98er



To: go4it who wrote (5065)2/12/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: SnakeInATuxedo  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 14226
 
Charles: Mr. Smith's Post #5066 is one insight to your pondering "why?", and I agree with his perception. Another thing to consider is simply this: it hasn't completely sunk in on everyone following the DD's just how *BIG* a deal this is. As a result, there are those who still feel it's some sort of semi-zero-sum game, where there have to be "winners" and, by nature, "losers". Naturally, everybody wants to be with a "winner", and in our naturally competitive world, some feel that winning must be at the expense of someone else losing; thus, not realising that this pie is big enough for all of us, all of our children, all our children's children... etc... some feel they have to play a silly game of "beggar thy neighbour" with the DD's and cast aspersions on DD's they don't happen to own in the hope of... I don't know for sure what they're hoping for... somehow making "their" favourite DD be the most successful. I don't remember what thread it was on, this one, maybe MXAM, maybe Mike's "New Age in Gold...." thread, but I suggested that the DD's should form a holding company to "own" each of their respective methods of extraction and barter the rights to each amongst themselves with royalties between them based on how much "goodies" they each got out of their dirts using not only their method but maybe the method of another one of the companies. Call it "co-opetition" if you will. Sure, we want them to compete, but there's a case to be made, I think, for sharing some of this extraction technology achievement - IF they all get to participate in the rewards of sharing. Will such an agreement be easy? No, of course not. But some "out-of-the-box" thinking needs to go on here, again as I said, because this is bigger than any of us can imagine. We're all semi-mesmerised by the numbers of tons of head ore each of these companies control and have to work with. Now, we're starting to see some of the "goodies" that can be had out of every one of those tons. Mike makes an excellent case over on his "New Age.. " thread that some real breakthroughs in extraction are about to be made. And let me finish with one final thought: are we really going to believe that this little patch of desert in Arizona is the only spot on this whole Earth that has micro-cluster mineralisation of this sort? Once these DD's start popping out "goodies" and prove they're there, people are going to start scouring every inch of the world for other "DD"-type deposits. And they're going to find them, too. Nothing is as un-stoppable as somebody with a dream.