Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doren who wrote (1392391)	2/22/2023 6:53:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571987

Doren, Ukraine can't win because we won't give them permission to invade Russia. They don't have to. All they need is to walk right into Crimea. To PooTin and the Z-nationalists, this is no different than invading RuZZia itself. Tenchusatsu

To: Doren who wrote (1392391)	2/22/2023 8:36:20 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Respond to of 1571987

Speaking of Crimea, there are rumors that the UK might supply Ukraine with Storm Shadow cruise missiles: Ukraine Should Have No Problem Arming Its Old Soviet Jets With New British Cruise Missiles (forbes.com) A low-observable (a.k.a. stealth) cruise missile with a range of 250km that can be launched from a Ukrainian fighter jet could be used to once again strike the Kersh bridge. However, I have some doubts about these rumors. Each cruise missile costs $3M, and Ukraine will probably want to launch them in a salvo, so the UK might have to supply at least a dozen. Plus the UK would put themselves at considerable risk of retaliation if they supplied these cruise missiles JUST for striking that bridge. I know, I know, PooTin is all talk when it comes to striking NATO, but there are still many in Europe who don't want to take the chance. Tenchusatsu