Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (266301)	2/24/2023 5:26:52 PM
From: Trader77	2 Recommendations Recommended By bentway Terry Maloney Respond to of 362393

Haha. "court filing on Trump side of an issue." No sane person would accept a bullshit Trump court filing. I suppose we can find a single example in one of your postings rejecting one of Trump's court filings.

To: Thomas M. who wrote (266301)	2/24/2023 5:50:41 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 362393

I'd bet there isn't one single example of you accepting the claims of a court filing on the Trump side of an issue. That could be so. You haven't seen me accept one the other way, either, not based just on a court filing. Because I don't accept any claims solely based on court filings as true. I do recognize as likely largely true those court filings from serious, reputable parties with cogent, articulate filings and/or backed by reasonable seeming investigations. And I know a tight presentation when I see one.The default is that they likely know what they are doing. And I recognize as likely untrue any filing from unserious parties and those documents that look sloppy to my reading. That said, I recognize that you and I might disagree on who is reputable. For example, I consider the Justice Department to be reputable until shown otherwise. I realize that you don't.