Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (196961)	3/5/2023 12:59:22 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By sense Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218168

<<What bullshit.>> So experimental vaccines are innocent until proven guilty? Whats really wierd is that other Covid solutions, like Ivermectin, Quercetin & Zinc, etc, are totally discounted, without scientific merit, for some odd reason. Why could that be? You’re never going to guess who funded Together trial which concluded ivermectin was ineffective to treat COVID: Democrat donor Sam Bankman-Fried’s bankrupt scam of a company FTX. Oh and Sam’s brother is the director of a non-profit called "Guarding Against Pandemics". pic.twitter.com/Gx67MeUJEK — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) November 15, 2022 and this just says it all. Ivermectin works – Zoe's Insights (phzoe.com) I gettit. "No evidence" The thing about science is that it welcomes dissent, it welcomes dissent with open arms because that is how science finds out if it's valid or not. If that isn't happening, and there is evidence that dissent is being discounted without valid cause, then you don't have science, you have an agenda, usually to make money even if human lives are seriously put at risk. I have no comment to make on those "facts" sources, other to say some of them look a tad peculiar. I leave it up to the reader to formulate their own opinion on the matter. I have espoused mine.