Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (47752)	2/12/1998 11:59:00 PM
From: Mo Chips	Respond to of 186894

<<Sounds like you have a real problem with Intel's high performance chips.>> WRONG!!!! I own one, I need it for my job. And I still own shares in intel, so it benefits me. But I am not a smug egomaniac and I see the realities of the marketplace. Everyone doesn't need one like me. But to ignore the realities of the marketplace will only condemn you to failure... Mo

To: Paul Engel who wrote (47752)	2/13/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, add another company to the list that Intel is investing in... Intel invests in design tool company By Andy Santoni InfoWorld Electric Posted at 6:30 PM PT, Feb 12, 1998 Continuing to spread its wealth around Silicon Valley and beyond, Intel this week made a minority investment in Abstract, a supplier of electronic design automation (EDA) tools for integrated circuits. Abstract becomes one of more than 100 companies in Intel's portfolio, which now totals more than $500 million in investments, according to Intel executives. The chip giant has invested in companies, such as Abstract, that provide technologies Intel uses, and in companies that are developing hardware and software products that will spur the use of computers. Abstract is developing EDA software that performs formal verification, a process that checks the computer-generated design of an integrated circuit against the written definition of the chip's function, explained Peter Glaskowsky, senior analyst at MicroDesign Resources, in Sunnyvale, Calif. Engineers use the technology at various stages of a circuit design to ensure pieces of the chip are designed correctly. Formal verification does not uncover errors in the definitions of each function block, or in the manufacturing process that follows, Glaskowsky noted. As chips become more complex, formal verification is becoming a necessity, Glaskowsky said. He noted that a processor such as the 64-bit Merced chip Intel is developing can contain tens of millions of transistors, and a graphics accelerator can be equally complex. These devices can take months to verify with today's tools, Glaskowsky said. For example, one graphics chip can take six months to go through the process. And without verification, errors in design have to be corrected in silicon, which is much more expensive. "Formal verification is becoming very important," Glaskowsky said. "Anything less is going to be risky." Today, circuit design has become a software project, Glaskowsky explained. The function blocks within a chip are equivalent to subroutines, he added. Intel uses formal verification as part of its validation process, said Jerry Budelman, engineering director at Intel, in Hillsboro, Ore. It is one of the pre-silicon stages of validation, where 95 percent of the bugs in a new design are uncovered, he said. Intel uses various techniques to validate a circuit design before it goes into production, then focuses on improving the reliability of working silicon, Budelman said. Once Intel introduces the product, the validation process uncovers and corrects errors. Abstract Inc., in Fremont, Calif., can be reached at (510) 445-4321 or abstract-inc.com. Intel Corp., in Santa Clara, Calif., can be reached at (800) 628-8686 or intel.com. _____________________________________________________________________ Regards, Michael