Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (635)	2/13/1998 12:06:00 AM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 6528

TC: SEC action in part was for actions related to inaccuarte or misleading claims that were made in 1994 prior to Raabe. The filing was in 96. The only part related to Raabe in any way was the lack of filing and that was all resolved as part of a consent decree. TG

To: TopCat who wrote (635)	2/13/1998 12:09:00 AM
From: LPasko	Respond to of 6528

TopCat, please understand that the SEC takes years to investigate things. During that time, management may change. It did--Mr. Raabe came on. The consent decree was against THE COMPANY for things IT did PRIOR to Mr. Raabejoining the Compnay. The only minor charge that might relate to both Mr. Raabe and his successor, Mr. Weaver, is that they were unable to figure out QP's financial mess sufficiently to file financial reports on time--my guess is it took years to unravel the mess these gentlemen inherited. This is an administrative charge, not a fraud charge. Again, Mr. Raabe is not alleged to have engaged in any wrongdoing--it can't be stated any plainer than that.