Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1393931)	3/8/2023 11:25:13 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574096

Funny.. you & team fraud are 0 for the millennium on predictions. Maybe try the circus ? Cleaning up after the animals is more your speed while magic hat jf kerry algore & 0bama fly around the planet in their G5’s while purchasing beach front properties while pitching the big climate lie.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1393931)	3/9/2023 12:02:41 AM
From: Maple MAGA	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574096

Can confiscatory taxes solve the problem of wealth inequality Confiscatory taxes refer to very high tax rates on high earners or wealthy individuals, sometimes exceeding 50% or even 70% of their income. While these taxes can generate significant revenue for governments, they may not necessarily solve the problem of wealth inequality. One reason is that wealthy individuals may take steps to avoid paying such high taxes, such as moving their wealth to tax havens or reducing their taxable income. This can make it difficult for governments to collect the revenue they need to fund public services and programs. Additionally, confiscatory taxes may discourage entrepreneurship and investment by high earners and wealthy individuals, as they may feel that the rewards for their efforts are not worth the high tax burden. This can reduce economic growth and job creation, which can ultimately harm the overall economy and worsen inequality. Moreover, wealth inequality is a complex issue that cannot be solved by taxes alone. Factors such as access to education, healthcare, and opportunities for upward mobility also play a significant role in determining a person's economic standing. Addressing these underlying issues may be necessary to truly address wealth inequality in a meaningful way. In conclusion, while confiscatory taxes may generate revenue for governments, they may not necessarily solve the problem of wealth inequality on their own. Other approaches such as improving access to education and opportunities for upward mobility may be necessary to achieve meaningful change.