Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shoot1st who wrote (778853)	3/13/2023 11:27:19 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793552

but.....who saw the fire and didn't call it in......that's the real issue. I'd ask why was there no employee in the train able to detect a blaze on the train.

To: Shoot1st who wrote (778853)	3/13/2023 11:28:14 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793552

what is the Norfolk Southern responsibility ? they didn't own the rails or tank cars? i assume they must have been a part of the beginning of the rail shipment? did they accept the order to accumulate this train of cars. did they out it together and dispatch the train over various rails? i assume they have responsibility for the initial rail shipment. Wouldn't it been their bill of ladings? who do the lawyers go after for damages. Who did own or maintain these rails. who did own the chemical cars? I was surprised they were not double hull and same with valves etc. something like nyc fire department requirements for gasoline tankers etc.