Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (197300)	3/15/2023 11:33:59 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 217699

"We can't just keep dragging this out." LOL !!! I thought the article said he was a judge ? 32 terabytes of discovery... a 90-day reprieve "review" required = 258.9 Mb per minute, 24 hours a day, for 90 days... i.e., not possible... and giving Bannon obvious out on appeal as... imposing impossible limits on his ability to mount a reasonable defense... [as it is not a reasonable and is an "open-ended" prosecution] essentially introducing "all information ever" as "evidence"... a not serious approach... persisting in which constitutes malicious prosecution... What it says is... both sides are pretending to "want to do this"... when both sides are dragging heels... and judge is not doing his job... to ensure it CAN just keep dragging out. Democrats want him sidelined until after next election... will go stupid trying to impose that... Bannon probably not wrong that after next election... it all just goes away... and, they're making it easy to drag heels... for a reason... If Bannon were serious... would file appeal now on reversible error in judge's prior rulings on motions allowing that massive pile of BS to be called "evidence"... Otherwise... should introduce 64 terabytes of defense documentation... in filing an objection... and appeal if the judge rules on it without reading it all... But, reality is... judge's fault... he should tell defense to present HIM with realistic evidence showing they have a viable case... as 32 terabytes is not a viable case... it should be dismissed on that basis alone... as it requires either the judge himself... or a jury... understanding all of that... Judge is failing if he does not impose a limit of... a couple of megabytes in the file size... on his desk by the end of the week... or case dismissed. But, of course... this is all theater... and the pretense of "the show" must go on... Otherwise... judge should tell the prosecution... plug your 32 terabytes into ChatGPT... and tell it to summarize it in a proof of a valid argument existing in two pages... or you're in contempt... If it does that... and it makes a lick of sense... exclude all "evidence" that is not relevant to the proof... Trial date scheduled by the end of next week... But of course... this has nothing to do with "the rule of law"...?